Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Need to Be on the Phone Now Trying to Trade Clausen to Raiders


Seltzer

Recommended Posts

Yes, because the Raiders, with their vertical, down-the-field passing attack, will want Jimmy "Noodle-Arm" Clausen.

Newsflash, the Raiders already have someone BETTER than Clausen on their team. His name is Kyle Boller.

Also, they drafted Pryor with a 3rd round pick - they don't need another inexperienced young QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Boller?? Proven mulitple times he can't win.

The Raiders aren't exactly aiting it out- check the stats. Just proposing a solution to try to get something for Clausen to help build the team.

The guy's not even active. The Raiders are desperate. Just throwing out an option for getting something for a guy that has zero future here.

What you propose the Panthers do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Boller?? Proven mulitple times he can't win.

The Raiders aren't exactly aiting it out- check the stats. Just proposing a solution to try to get something for Clausen to help build the team.

The guy's not even active. The Raiders are desperate. Just throwing out an option for getting something for a guy that has zero future here.

What you propose the Panthers do?

Just because the stats aren't there doesn't mean their offensive philosophy isn't a vertical passing attack (it is). Also, Clausen and Boller are pretty much the same player, save Boller actually has an NFL-caliber arm, so yes, he is better. The Raiders may be "desperate," but they sure as hell aren't desperate enough for Jimmy Clausen.

It doesn't matter what I propose the Panthers do, because the simple fact is we're not going to do anything. And save trying to get a stop-gap DT (which we can get in FA - Jamal Williams, Pat Williams), there really isn't much that we realistically CAN do. For better or worse, we're going to roll with who we've got right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...