Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Scott Fowler an idiot or am I just crazy?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

He orchestrated 2 nice 4th qtr drives lately, 1 against Minn, and then yesterday to tie it up. He will be fine.

Unfortunately, he is being put in a position that is ripe for int's, down late in the game, have to pass to tie it up or win, and the defense licking their lips. It is not exactly a formula for success with a young QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he had one yesterday.

it's just that the couple minutes left on the clock was more than enough time for the defense to let the lions offense score.

TRUTH. You can not expect anything more of your QB than to do what Cam did tying the game up. Led a great drive, capped it off with a 2 pt conversion.

Defense holds, you get the ball back, and drive for the game winning FG.

Nothing more demoralizing than having your defense put up less effort than Lindsey Lohan in rehab.

Newton is put in can't win situations week after week. Even Brady/Manning/Brees would have trouble trying to bail the defense out AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fowler coaches in the youth basketball league I coach in. He's an alright guy in person, but I think it's funny how some people who know he works for the Observer are in awe of him or something.

He coaches in the same age group I do and Fowler is the assistant coach to the biggest hole in the league. My happiest moment as a coach last year was beating that guy's team.

We had evaluations last week and as I was standing beside him I thought about making a remark about how I was going to beat him worse than Smitty did in his interview last week but I figured it would just fuel his "quasi- celebrity" status and I wanted to treat him like the nobody he truly is.

Btw, Paul Silas taught in an older age group a couple of years ago before he got the Bobcats head gig and I used to see him at the gym. He is a big dude, and he still has a sweet jump shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott Fowler is brilliant. The obvious logic...

One of the 'top' owners in the league, our very own JR, believes Marty Hurney is brilliant--or he would have fired Marty Hurney.

Marty Hurney is a former journalist.

Scott Fowler is a journalist.

Therefore, Scott Fowler is brilliant.

...and is fully qualified to be our next GM.

THERE YOU GO!

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/11/20/2793066/panthers-newton-still-not-good.html#ixzz1eMMLq600

I specifically remember Cam scoring the game winning touchdown w/ about 4 minutes left in the 4th quarter vs. Jacksonville.

Does it need to be 1 minute left? Or because it was in a monsoon does it not count?

You can consider that a comeback win, certainly, and you are not crazy, it's counted as such, but I'm not sure most people would call that a signature 4th quarter win though, which is what Scott Fowler is saying. He's considering the nature of the game, not just the fact it was the defense that closed out the game for us and saved the real game winning touchdown from taking place.

In reality what he's really referring to is the fact he's also 1 out of 8 opportunities to win the game in the 4th quarter(most QB's don't get 8 chances a year to do that) and people are beginning to notice, so he's being nice about it. He's not saying Cam Newton is a total choke artist in 4th quarter comebacks and only 1 out of 8. He's saying he hasn't had a signature comeback win yet.

Capiche?

Even though most here want to discount it as "it doesn't matter, it's the defense's fault for not stopping them earlier", it does matter and people do freaking notice it. It 2-8 matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...