Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Broncos stat that everyone will ignore...


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

i would argue that it is easy to give up only 12 points per game when you can run it 40 times.

But if you run it 40 times a game, its a lot harder to score more than 12-13 points a game these days. So if we were doing that, we would be losing games 13-10 instead of 30-27.

Although with our defense, I can't see us holding anyone to 10 points except in a Monsoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 5 games the Broncos have given up scores of 15, 10, 10, 13, and 13 respectively.

Easy to run it 40 times when you give up 12 points a week.

agree, though The Golden Calf of Bristol is part of that... he doesn't turn the ball over

i would argue that it is easy to give up only 12 points per game when you can run it 40 times.

perfect-storm.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's only going to be ignored because it's a quarterback driven league, for better or for worse. We refer to teams by their QB's and the nature of the game has definitively turned to PROTECT just them.

So when the Pats win a game, we say that Brady won it. Shouldn't expect it to be any different for The Golden Calf of Bristol. Ironically, if The Golden Calf of Bristol is anything truly like the veneer he puts on, he'd probably agree with you guys that he gets too much credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also didnt think that Tepper was too involved. I think he liked to be engaged in the process but never did he seem to influence anything.  If Im an owner Im in the draft room as well. Hell I get excited about draft season in Madden if I can do it in real life.... 
    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
×
×
  • Create New...