Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Byron Bell


ItsPantone278

Recommended Posts

He's not on Otah's level, but at least he can stay on the field.

Throw on some tape from 2008 or 2009, Otah just mauls people in the running game and holds up pretty well in the passing game. Bell doesn't. He's playing well for an UDFA, but he's also showing why he was undrafted. Good depth, nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not on Otah's level, but at least he can stay on the field.

Throw on some tape from 2008 or 2009, Otah just mauls people in the running game and holds up pretty well in the passing game. Bell doesn't. He's playing well for an UDFA, but he's also showing why he was undrafted. Good depth, nothing more.

Otah is pretty bad in pass pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otah was fine in pass protection for a RT. Pre-injury he was a big bodied athletic OT with reasonable technique i.e. the DE always struggled to bull rush him and they had to go a loooong way to get around him.

Like every T if he was beaten off the snap he was toast, but that rarely happened. He had the RT position comfortably locked down before his injuries and our Oline was much better for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...