Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barely escaping the worst team in the league...


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

So we had a 36/23 minute advantage in time of possession in the Colts game and it's Cam's fault that our defense is "worn down" and giving up points?

Our defense must have been pretty worn out in the 2nd quarter when Donald Brown ran 17 yards untouched for a TD, which was setup by Cap giving up 42 yards on a PI call.

Yeah, it is the offenses fault both Colt TD drives started at the Colts 20 as they went through them like a wet paperbag. Same logic as to why it is Cam's fault the ST have allowed more returns for TDs than any team in the NFL.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have an efficient offense and have benefit from one of the best schedules in the league. Look it up. They played the most inefficient offenses in the league.

That will have a drastic effect year to year.

They played Indianapolis, Miami, Jacksonville(twice), Pittsburg, Tampa Bay and Cleveland.

They played two average offenses, Oakland and Titans, and they split the wins and losses.

They played two very efficient offenses, New Orleans and Baltimore, and they got schooled both times. They lost both their games against efficient offenses. Once by 29-14 and once by 40-33.

Schedule has a drastic affect on a team's win-loss record, offensive efficiency, defensive points allowed and every other stat.

Hou has played crappy teams which has allowed them to statistically look great on D.....

But the fact remains how good the offense was with Schuab under center now goes out the window. A Yates lead offense isn't the same offense. Yates also will impact the D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

We have the 31st scoring defense in the league and the only reason we aren't dead last in every category is because we have such a good offense(top 10)

We actually hold onto the ball for a bit, it just doesn't take teams long to score on us, especially in the second half.

most of that comes in the 2nd half.. I'm still trying to locate 1st half -vs- 2nd half defensive stats, but my eyes and everyones eyes should point out our 1st half defensive play is very solid for the most part..

Link to comment

I guess McDermott disagrees as well since he gave the defense a pep talk on Saturday night and told them they need to start playing up to the level of our offense and carrying their weight.

I don't think a coach stands in front of a room full of his players and yells at them about stepping up if he thinks the offense is setting his defense up for failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of that comes in the 2nd half.. I'm still trying to locate 1st half -vs- 2nd half defensive stats, but my eyes and everyones eyes should point out our 1st half defensive play is very solid for the most part..

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/team-stats/ has by quarter, by half of some stats, but not all. have at it.

defense is pretty awful in both 1st half and 2nd half but is considerably worse in the 2nd, at least relative to the rest of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of that comes in the 2nd half.. I'm still trying to locate 1st half -vs- 2nd half defensive stats, but my eyes and everyones eyes should point out our 1st half defensive play is very solid for the most part..

Well yea that seems to be the case but what is the reason? Depth? Coaching?

I also don't get why people keep dragging on a conversation with a guy who is just trying to get a rise out of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offense I also believe has had the lead at half in the majority of games.....and gotten a lead in the 4th in most games.

while the stats spewed about in the fox games are actually not always correct, they said at one point we lost 8 2nd half (or was it 4th quarter? can't recall) leads

edit: decided to look real quick

Arizona: 4th quarter lead lost

Green Bay: 3rd quarter lead lost (admittedly on the first drive of the 3rd :P)

NO: 4th quarter lead lost

Atl: 4th quarter lead lost

Min: 3rd quarter lead lost (4th quarter tie lost)

Det: 4th quarter lead lost (and tie)

I think maybe they meant we lead at some point in 8 games. We may have, in the first quarter, didn't check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...