Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Meeks and Peppers...


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

One thing i think people have completley overlooked is the possibility of peppers staying and how he will fit into ron meeks defense

The next name that comes to mind immediately is Dwight Freeny.

I think peppers is a better DE than freeny and about equal in terms of his pass rushing skill.

If peppers stays will he see the best production of his career?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont think meeks DEF will do anything for pepp.its not like this new scheme is too much diff than are old one..maybe we stop droping him back so much but thats about it.

I personally don't mind seeing Pep dropped back some. It might not look as good on the stat line as a sack, but it can be very effective having a guy that is tall, fast, and has ridiculous hops help out on underneath routes from time to time. While I admit I don't have much game film (typically I delete my DirecTV DVR Sunday Ticket recordings after a couple weeks), I'm sure if you watch it you can see QB's have to make some adjustments because Pep dropped back and didn't just rush in. I know he hasn't had a pick in a while, but I'm sure he's helped some other guys get them, and a pick is WAY better than a sack. Just my $.02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's possible... you didn't see Freeney dropping into coverage much.

If the Panthers really do want to keep Peppers, I would imagine they have already decided they are going to cut him loose on the pass rush and save coverage duties for someone else. I think it's more likely that Meeks would be able to connect with Peppers on a personal level and Peppers would gain a level of comfort and trust with Meeks that might convince him to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Meeks being brought in as more of a move to draw in the reigns so to speak. Get the core players to tighten up their play, stay at home so to speak.

I'm sure they'll be tweaks here and there, but it's still Fox's defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont think meeks DEF will do anything for pepp.its not like this new scheme is too much diff than are old one..maybe we stop droping him back so much but thats about it.

I think it will let him focus on pass rushing more than he ever has. I also don't think we will see him drop into coverage very much, if at all (hence, more pass rushing opportunities).

The Tampa 2 is predicated upon the DL getting the bulk of the pressure on the QB, so Meeks coaches his DE's to be much more relentless in chasing down the QB than what Trgo did. Trgo was a believer in the read and react defense, and wanted his DL to maintain integrity, whereas Meeks requires his DL to be much more aggressive in pass rush. Of course the downside to that is inconsistency in run defense, but all of our DL (with perhaps the exception of Lewis) are better run defenders than what Meeks had to work with in Indy, so hopefully we'll have a bit more consistency than they were used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys bringing in meeks is going to have a negligible impact to the way they play defense.

Several players have already come out and said how different this defense is, and that Meeks is asking them to do a lot of things differently than they did under Trgo.

I think a lot of people are falsely under the impression that Fox is more involved in running the defense than he is because he felt the need to step in the last two years. However, prior to that, there was never a peep about Fox undermining Trgo or not letting him run the defense in whatever way he wanted. As head coach, and particularly one that was a DC, I have no doubt that Fox set the parameters, but that is his job. I don't think, though, that he took a more prominant role until he lost faith in Trgo.

Bottom line, I think Fox will let Meeks run his defense as long as he trusts the job he is doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several players have already come out and said how different this defense is, and that Meeks is asking them to do a lot of things differently than they did under Trgo.I think a lot of people are falsely under the impression that Fox is more involved in running the defense than he is because he felt the need to step in the last two years. However, prior to that, there was never a peep about Fox undermining Trgo or not letting him run the defense in whatever way he wanted. As head coach, and particularly one that was a DC, I have no doubt that Fox set the parameters, but that is his job. I don't think, though, that he took a more prominant role until he lost faith in Trgo.

Bottom line, I think Fox will let Meeks run his defense as long as he trusts the job he is doing.

very true if anything this will have a big diff in are linebackers and S,i think they have a lot of control over the field now if i am not mistaken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will let him focus on pass rushing more than he ever has. I also don't think we will see him drop into coverage very much, if at all (hence, more pass rushing opportunities).

The Tampa 2 is predicated upon the DL getting the bulk of the pressure on the QB, so Meeks coaches his DE's to be much more relentless in chasing down the QB than what Trgo did. Trgo was a believer in the read and react defense, and wanted his DL to maintain integrity, whereas Meeks requires his DL to be much more aggressive in pass rush. Of course the downside to that is inconsistency in run defense, but all of our DL (with perhaps the exception of Lewis) are better run defenders than what Meeks had to work with in Indy, so hopefully we'll have a bit more consistency than they were used to.

I agree....I think you will see the DE's pinning their ears back more under Meeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't mind seeing Pep dropped back some. It might not look as good on the stat line as a sack, but it can be very effective having a guy that is tall, fast, and has ridiculous hops help out on underneath routes from time to time. While I admit I don't have much game film (typically I delete my DirecTV DVR Sunday Ticket recordings after a couple weeks), I'm sure if you watch it you can see QB's have to make some adjustments because Pep dropped back and didn't just rush in. I know he hasn't had a pick in a while, but I'm sure he's helped some other guys get them, and a pick is WAY better than a sack. Just my $.02

He had a pick in the Pro Bowl!!! If that counts. HaHaHa :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...