Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unbiased website. Newton vs Tebow


Yaboychris28

Recommended Posts

Tim has been in a nfl system for 2 years and has had more quailty quarterback coaching that cam. For being the starter for 3 years at florida and 2 years pro.

Those 3 years at Florida sure did make him a polished NFL QB :confused:

Being third on the depth chart in a John Fox system also screams "quality quarterback coaching" considering John Fox hated and he's John fuging Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim has been in a nfl system for 2 years and has had more quailty quarterback coaching that cam. For being the starter for 3 years at florida and 2 years pro.

I don't know that I'd buy that. How many Florida quarterbacks do you see succeeding in the NFL?

I'd say Newton owes his success more to George Whitfield and Mike Shula than his college coaches. The Golden Calf of Bristol had similar help and has had more time to adjust but just isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know that I'd buy that. How many Florida quarterbacks do you see succeeding in the NFL?

I'd say Newton owes his success more to George Whitfield and Mike Shula than his college coaches. The Golden Calf of Bristol had similar help and has had more time to adjust but just isn't there.

Im sure any quarterback coaching you get at one of the top football programs in the country is better than what you get at d-2 school. Yes cam had one year at auburn,but their offense was just as wonky as florida's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those 3 years at Florida sure did make him a polished NFL QB :confused:

Being third on the depth chart in a John Fox system also screams "quality quarterback coaching" considering John Fox hated and he's John fuging Fox.

No it didnt make tim polished. But, part of that is just because tim doesn't have the skillset most qbs have. His throwing motion is always gonna be awful. Remember that whole offseason he has supposedly fix it?. Now he's back to throwing side armed.

And as far as being 3rd string on a john fox coached team come on... John was not there coach last year where tim was a rookie learning the majority of the year holding a clipboard. And john fox isnt the qb coach responsible for tim's devlopement. Yes he plays in fox's system but, fox is not the one teaching tim to be a quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sure any quarterback coaching you get at one of the top football programs in the country is better than what you get at d-2 school. Yes cam had one year at auburn,but their offense was just as wonky as florida's.

Have you looked at how Florida QBs tend to fare in the NFL?

Here are some of The Golden Calf of Bristol's predecessors:

- Chris Leak

- Rex Grossman

- Jesse Palmer

- Doug Johnson

- Danny Wuerffel

- Shane Matthews

Granted these are under different coaches, but mostly similar systems and all the same school.

When your most successful product is Rex Grossman, you can't exactly lay claim to being a school that produces great pro quarterbacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you notice no one is comparing cam to dalton latley all because he is not WINNING. but if he was....... oh my god!!!! winning is a team effort dude, with defense being more important.

and you can tell cam is better becaue everyone uses him as a measuring stick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But now The Golden Calf of Bristol has the all mighty John Fox and his desire to develop QBs.......

Plus, having those 11 starts compared to Cam's 13 really let The Golden Calf of Bristol get a feel for the game. All those reps as third stringer out of sheer spite from Fox in that limited camp really helped his development as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how people are comparing a QB that has been in the league to a QB that is a Rookie. If there is an argument right now, there want be in a year or two.

While there is no replacement for NFL experience, The Golden Calf of Bristol really isn't your typical "QB that has been in the league." He's a second year pro that played 3 games as a rookie then ended up with a new head coach, new offensive system, all in a shortened year. I do think that The Golden Calf of Bristol benefited from playing a bit at the end last year but he isn't a really good example of a veteran QB or something... he's a very young inexperienced guy too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those 3 years at Florida sure did make him a polished NFL QB :confused:

Being third on the depth chart in a John Fox system also screams "quality quarterback coaching" considering John Fox hated and he's John f*cking Fox.

But now The Golden Calf of Bristol has the all mighty John Fox and his desire to develop QBs.......

Plus, having those 11 starts compared to Cam's 13 really let The Golden Calf of Bristol get a feel for the game. All those reps as third stringer out of sheer spite from Fox in that limited camp really helped his development as well.

Your arguments are laughable. You dance around the facts like a ballerina. The Golden Calf of Bristol has had 2 training camps and two years worth of NFL QB coaching and still is only at the level of an NFL Rookie. While Newton has had one TC and not even a year of NFL QB coaching. Trying to argue starts is down right ignorant cause The Golden Calf of Bristol has more games(20) than Cam.

Like I said before, people have to twist crap to even try to get a good argument that The Golden Calf of Bristol is better than Cam. Next year there will be no argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While there is no replacement for NFL experience, The Golden Calf of Bristol really isn't your typical "QB that has been in the league." He's a second year pro that played 3 games as a rookie then ended up with a new head coach, new offensive system, all in a shortened year. I do think that The Golden Calf of Bristol benefited from playing a bit at the end last year but he isn't a really good example of a veteran QB or something... he's a very young inexperienced guy too.

Why do people keep bringing that he is inexperienced up when Gabbert is prob in the worst situation for a QB and has better stats then The Golden Calf of Bristol and just as many starts. As I have said before you can twist it all you want but the numbers dont lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do people keep bringing that he is inexperienced up when Gabbert is prob in the worst situation for a QB and has better stats then The Golden Calf of Bristol and just as many starts. As I have said before you can twist it all you want but the numbers dont lie.

how does gabbert have "better stats" than The Golden Calf of Bristol? he has 4 fewer TDs, like four times as many interceptions, certainly doesn't have the "wins argument" on his side, barely has a higher completion percentage, has a low YPA, a lower YPC... I mean sure Gabbert has had his moments that make me think he still has a chance in this league but there is no way to objectively look at The Golden Calf of Bristol and Gabbert and say Gabbert is having the better season stats wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really. It all depends upon perspective. You can draft quality OTs high every year. They have one of the lowest bust rates by position. DTs, less so, but good ones still come along at a regular clip. With WRs, it's simply best to draft one in the first round if you want a legit play maker. Moreover, WR is going to set you back more than OT or DT at really all statuses, meaning JAG receivers are going to make more than JAG OTs and DTs, and elite receivers will make substantially more than elite OTs or DTs. I would also argue that it's much harder to find a franchise level OT or DT that can have an altering impact upon the game. So, if you don't believe they can, you may as well wait for day 2 or 3. That's why sticking to your board is probably the wisest thing to do. If you're not committed that the value is there, then what are you doing? Lastly, I don't think you should necessarily draft in a vacuum, but you must look at each team from year to year. People want to make them the same, but they're different. You have to start over every year and identify where the strengths and weaknesses are. You can't say, "Well we drafted [so and so] last year or two years ago, so we'll just draft this this year." That's not realistic and it can be highly counterproductive, especially in light of the reason that you should be trying to use FA to set up the draft.
    • If you read through his stuff, he's had a raging hate-boner for the Carolina Panthers the likes of which would make many long-tenured Huddlers blush. Every win was "yeah but" and every loss was "see I told you so".
    • Let me preface this by saying I've read WalterFootball on and off for 20 years. That's an indictment on my decision-making, and it's more than fair to be questioned.  However, the days of reading what's become weak ragebait have drawn to a close after he re-graded the 2025 NFL Draft's first round. He gave T-Mac a C on draft night. What was his re-grade for the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?  Carolina Panthers: Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona – C Grade One-Year Grade: C+ Grade Tetairoa McMillan won Offensive Rookie of the Year, but only by default after Emeka Egbuka vanished in the second half of the season. McMillan was good, and was certainly limited by Bryce Young’s mediocrity, but there are still concerns about his work ethic and passion for football. If he doesn’t progress in the coming years, we’ll know why. Original Write-up: Wow, our Panthers source did not pan out for once. Jalon Walker was heavy chalk to go here, but the Panthers decided to draft a No. 1 receiver instead. While this fills a need, I’m concerned with Tetairoa McMillan’s work ethic, which is something you never want to hear from a first-round prospect, especially one who is chosen in the top 10. Bryce Young needs this, and McMillan is talented, but will he give 100 percent at the next level? Also, what about the defense, which was the worst in the NFL last year? https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades2025.php
×
×
  • Create New...