Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Great night


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Lol I used to do the same thing, meet a chick drunk at the bar, get her number and snap a pic of her without her knowing!

I started this because I used to get multiple numbers from chicks some nights....the next weekend would roll around and I would be like, whodafug is Allison. If I couldn't snap the pic, I would input their number into my phone as "Allison tits stripped shirt @ Dixie's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol I used to do the same thing, meet a chick drunk at the bar, get her number and snap a pic of her without her knowing!

I started this because I used to get multiple numbers from chicks some nights....the next weekend would roll around and I would be like, whodafug is Allison. If I couldn't snap the pic, I would input their number into my phone as "Allison tits stripped shirt @ Dixie's"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is the fun in getting permission? Plus I didn't want to be that guy.

When I said I got her number, I meant I gave her my number, then she promptly texted me so I have hers. So, it is a real number.

This isn't my first number pulled, but it is the first one pulled as a single man in a loooong time.

Met her at bullards. Its a hole in the wall in pender county. This chick lives in Wilmington though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol I used to do the same thing, meet a chick drunk at the bar, get her number and snap a pic of her without her knowing!

I started this because I used to get multiple numbers from chicks some nights....the next weekend would roll around and I would be like, whodafug is Allison. If I couldn't snap the pic, I would input their number into my phone as "Allison tits stripped shirt @ Dixie's"

You da Man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...