Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol gamble is basically having as good a year as revis


Fiz

Recommended Posts

First off, I like Gamble a lot, always have.

That said, it's kinda like the Champ Bailey thing in Denver, and until this season the Jammer thing in SD. If the rest of the secondary is below average, or bad, why in the world throw to the one shining spot.

Why exactly would that make opposing QBs have a low QB rating when throwing to him?

You'd think if that were true, opposing QBs would have a decent QB rating when throwing to his coverage but just wouldn't go to him very often.

Not only do they not target him often, they have an awful rating when they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why exactly would that make opposing QBs have a low QB rating when throwing to him?

You'd think if that were true, opposing QBs would have a decent QB rating when throwing to his coverage but just wouldn't go to him very often.

Not only do they not target him often, they have an awful rating when they do.

I don't think I understand what you are saying.

Gamble is a really good CB, QB's would just rather throw against Capt..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I understand what you are saying.

Gamble is a really good CB, QB's would just rather throw against Capt..

Click the link and read before you post.

This is based on qb rating when thrown at. Whether or not they're picking on captain, gamble is still holding it down when they do challenge him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...