Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Raiding Raiders roster?

KDawg004

By KDawg004,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
Posted

With all the turnover going on in Oakland, I was thinking a new head coach might want to bring in his own players to fit his system. Therefore, there might be a few players Oakland might deem expendable. They have some great depth along the DL. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

The one dude that I would want from OAK is McClain. He is better than the LBs from Bama that are coming out this year.

But I know it won't happen and I know you said DL.

Just not sure if they are really that much more expendable than any other DLman in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

The one dude that I would want from OAK is McClain. He is better than the LBs from Bama that are coming out this year.

But I know it won't happen and I know you said DL.

Just not sure if they are really that much more expendable than any other DLman in the league.

McClain sounds like headcase

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just mentioned the DL bc they have good depth. But i'd be looking at the whole roster in general. McClain does sound like a headcase. He was also drafted recently so i'm not sure they would deal him. Lamarr Houston would be intriguing. Maybe Jacoby Ford as a returner? Seymour if they want to get rid of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
soysauce2580 Newbie

soysauce2580

Posted
Posted

My brothers a big time Raiders fan, so I've seen a couple of Raider games. From what I can tell, I would take McClain, Seymour, Branch as a FS instead of a SS in a heartbeat. My brother says that Branch is really good as a FS, but they play him as a SS for some odd reason. I would also take Wisnewski and Stanford Rout too haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By Waldo · Posted

      For a 3rd year QB? That flies with the Teppers and makes the HC and GM look like fools.  Their fear is evident. Their careers are tied to making it work, it's ehy they signed on here and they are professionals who knows what kind of a situation they could potentially have on their hands if they are not calculating about popping up Bryce. I call BS to that sir. It's why every QB after Bryce couldn't make any other rosters past a PS spot...at best
    • CRA
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By CRA · Posted

      Not just Dalton.   But the only real young arm they would let be seen the past 2 years was a really a bad Jack Plummer.  Who was super weak even for that tier  Can’t convince me how weak they made the atmosphere around Young hasn’t been intentional.     
    • JawnyBlaze
      Smitty on TMac

      By JawnyBlaze · Posted

      Things of note: mentions he has six drops. Six. For all the people that don’t know what a drop is, he has six. That’s a long distance from the league leader at ten. (To be fair, pro football reference has him at seven, still not bad.  Plenty of others is that same range.  His drop % is 6.3, which is low.) Catchable ball success ratio: 83% which is great. Catchable being the key word.  Mentions his contested catch rate is low at 5/18 but that’ll get better I think when he can rely on muscle memory for routes, catches, etc and the game slows down for him
×
×
  • Create New...