Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Raiding Raiders roster?


KDawg004

Recommended Posts

With all the turnover going on in Oakland, I was thinking a new head coach might want to bring in his own players to fit his system. Therefore, there might be a few players Oakland might deem expendable. They have some great depth along the DL. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one dude that I would want from OAK is McClain. He is better than the LBs from Bama that are coming out this year.

But I know it won't happen and I know you said DL.

Just not sure if they are really that much more expendable than any other DLman in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one dude that I would want from OAK is McClain. He is better than the LBs from Bama that are coming out this year.

But I know it won't happen and I know you said DL.

Just not sure if they are really that much more expendable than any other DLman in the league.

McClain sounds like headcase

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just mentioned the DL bc they have good depth. But i'd be looking at the whole roster in general. McClain does sound like a headcase. He was also drafted recently so i'm not sure they would deal him. Lamarr Houston would be intriguing. Maybe Jacoby Ford as a returner? Seymour if they want to get rid of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brothers a big time Raiders fan, so I've seen a couple of Raider games. From what I can tell, I would take McClain, Seymour, Branch as a FS instead of a SS in a heartbeat. My brother says that Branch is really good as a FS, but they play him as a SS for some odd reason. I would also take Wisnewski and Stanford Rout too haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's definitely a historical issue at QB but to be perfectly blunt, we also don't do a good job of really developing almost any position if you look at the last decade or so. I tend to be on the side of that being far less a development issue than an evaluation deficiency.  I think we are in the situation at QB2/3 recently due to the overall roster being absolutely abhorrent and the QB classes being quite thin. It is harder to justify another Matt Corral(or several) when you can potentially get a real two deep contributor at other positions.  But, it was a lot of hard work to get to the point where are roster is so incredibly bad that luxury picks literally are not in our vocabulary.  This is the reaping what you sow portion of our history.
    • That is what I meant about our front office. They are like someone filling out a March Madness bracket based on preference of uniform colors and mascots. There's no rhyme of reason to some of these fugg'n mind numbing decisions they make.  They go all in on these flimsy-@ss prospects and are gun shy when it comes to more solid prospects.  It's literally maddening and the reason I stopped being so emotionally involved in this team. Heck the only reason I'm active on the board today is one, it's my day off and two, it's cut down time.  
    • Search Carolina Panthers 2025 Cuts in google. eliminates the bs for you
×
×
  • Create New...