Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SO what could we get if we trade down?


section543

Recommended Posts

For a team with multiple holes, picking up extra picks would be great. This is even more attractive seeing as how we are out of the top 5-6 picks where the blue chippers reside.

Moving from 9 to mid teens would be better in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see the Bengals trading their 17 and their 2nd rounder to move up to take Richardson. I think it makes a lot of sense for both teams and i'd do it in a heart beat.

If they want a runningback I would trade Dwill straight up for the 17th. No way they would take on that contract though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks its not just "lets trade down"

IF it happens, its going to have to be on trade day, and it all depends on who is still on the board. Considering there are really only 2 guaranteed first round QBs that makes it even more difficult. Maybe a receiver? We don't know. It's so early that its really difficult to tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood15

An interesting trade partner would be the Arizona cardinals at 13 or the Bengals at 17. I think it be a great move to move back into the teens, pick up Best DT, CB, or OL available and also gain a pick in the 3rd round or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals can probably get Richardson at 17 without moving. But, if for some reason the Bengals wanted to switch pick 17 for our pick at 8, then we should be able to get another second rounder. don't see it happening, but it would be wonderful for them to move up in front of Miami to get Richardson.

If I were them, I would offer the second first rounder for Stewart. Use their first one on a CB or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...