Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about coaching interviews


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

If he was smart instead of showing them the Panthers playbook which was designed to feature Newton, he would have designed plays for their respective quarterbacks. If you watch film of our offense you can get a good understanding of our playbook.

You do bring up a good point. Will Tampa Bay gain understanding of his philosophy and style of playcalling based on his interview there. And how much do these interviewees actually share with a divisional opponent. I wonder if Rivera and Hurney discuss that issue with him before he goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the Bucs have no intention of repeating their past hire (young, little experience). So, interviewing a young, possibly up and coming coordinator seems like it would be a waste of everyone's time and expense on the Bucs part.

So are they picking his brain to get ideas to help their QB and offense or are they learning something about a division rival? Does not look like he is a serious candidate for HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the interview process is more about the problems that the Bucks are facing and not on any particular part of how the Panthers do things. Chud is one of the hot candidates now and to not bring him in would invite charges that they didn't look hard enough from a pretty upset fanbase right now. Sure it cost a plane ticket and a night or two at the hotel, but I'm sure they can spare it.

I also don't think Chud is ready for a HC position. He wasn't brought back for 2nd interview anywhere (the Jags thing was a typo) and hasn't impressed anybody as far as I could find. I'm hoping that by getting rejected a few times it will cool his heels. Chud will be a great HC in this league after he get's some more experience under his belt, but I think he's a few years from having the understanding he needs to make the transition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of HC positions he is filling...

The suggestion was that he was only being interviewed in order to pick his brain as a division rival and that they were not interested in considering him.

I don't find that to be a realistic scenario, do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the Bucs have no intention of repeating their past hire (young, little experience). So, interviewing a young, possibly up and coming coordinator seems like it would be a waste of everyone's time and expense on the Bucs part.

So are they picking his brain to get ideas to help their QB and offense or are they learning something about a division rival? Does not look like he is a serious candidate for HC.

That's a good point but I doubt they could learn anything that would result in a more-than-trivial advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that Tampa would bring him in just to pick his brain but I think the reality is that they may pick up nuggets along the way they can use against the Panthers. Surely all of us have seen situations where a past coach of a team goes elsewhere and that coach always seems to do well against his former team. I would have to believe that it is surely possible that after picking a guys brain for hours dissecting his coaching style, philosophy, playcalling tendencies, etc you will learn something you can use against them when you play them twice a year. You don't think that if we played San Diego that Rivera would have an edge because he worked with Turner. Yeah I know 3 seasons is different than 4 hours but you get my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also don't think Chud is ready for a HC position. He wasn't brought back for 2nd interview anywhere (the Jags thing was a typo) and hasn't impressed anybody as far as I could find. I'm hoping that by getting rejected a few times it will cool his heels. Chud will be a great HC in this league after he get's some more experience under his belt, but I think he's a few years from having the understanding he needs to make the transition.
How would we know if he impressed or not?

I think Chudz went on the interviews because he was asked not because he was seeking.

There's a big difference between the 2.

I don't think Chudz was seeking a HC position this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...