Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Not Draft a WR?


IplayedCam#1317

Recommended Posts

We do need a WR. We have no potential #1 next to smitty who these fans have a hard time accepting his inevitable aging. Besides oline there is no other need on offense and if we are going with Otah, WR is the #1 need. Why in the hell would you bank on Gettis? I want a WR but it's far from the top f the list considering the entire team and not just the offense.

We don't need a WR this year and maybe not next, but what then? We need a real #1 with Cam, and someone Cam can grow with. It's a little short sighted to say we have no need for a WR when there is zero #1 material on the team.You don't draft a WR when you immediately need one, they can take a couple years to develop. Blackmon will be gone at our pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we have Steve, Gettis, and Brandon but after that who do we really have? Other than the TE and RB. Somebody with sure Hands that we can use for pick plays, Cross Routes, Etc. Just a thought.

let me see if I can spell this out appropriately...

your question is asking why don't we need another receiver after naming 3 guys who will be starting along with a solid backup in Naanee and ignoring 2 main targets in Olsen and Shockey (2 more "WR"), so why aren't we in need of drafting another receiver despite this sport requiring 21 starters (a team game) and having holes all over the defense and a need to shore up the OLine?

not_sure_if_serious.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our whole draft should basically be defense. WR is a need but I think we have a cometitive enough offense to wait and see if Gettis will step it up this year.

Still the time for a new #1 WR is going to come and I hope Hurney is prepared because he is god awful at picking WRs and he should start while there is time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've shown you numerous comps for other tackles in the same age and talent range.  His contract, taking into account his age, health, etc.  is the going rate.  It's a fair deal. I've shown you examples of how long it usually takes to find even an average replacement.  Hell, look at every tackle that has ever started for the Panthers.  How many would you consider a success?  They are not easy to find. After everything we've done with this team since drafting Bryce why would we decide to let our best linemen go and add a huge question mark at tackle?   FA is a crapshoot in which any guy available will have cons/issues.  If not, they'll cost a fortune.   Outside of a first or maybe 2nd round pic next year it'll take a few years for a tackle to learn the position at the NFL level.  There are still questions about Icky. Every vet NFL player deals with maintenance.  Between the contract value and history I'm not overly worried about his knee.  I contend his knee issue isn't anything to be overly worried about.  It's not zero risk but it's an acceptable risk.  Every player we draft and every contract we sign has risk.  You're blowing up his own negative words about his knees and ignoring him saying he is healthy and the knee is a non issue.  You have a strong chicken little complex with this team.  Being he has always been a Panther they are very aware of any health issues. We paid now because now is cheaper.  If his knee was really an issue they would have waited.  That tells me it's not the issue you want it to be.    
    • Sauls getting cut by Steelers if no trade happens.
    • No they are going to give Claudin Cherelus 2 spots. 
×
×
  • Create New...