Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther 7-round draft


MHS831

Recommended Posts

PANTHERS’ DRAFT (includes pick acquired in trade w/ Arizona for a 3rd rounder)

1. Michael Brockers DT (LSU)—Rough, but he can develop on a rotational basis while Edwards plays his last (only) year with the Panthers. Brockers has all the tools to be great, he just needs time. However, he is good enough to play now. With Fua and McClain, Shirley and Kearse (PS), we should be stocked at DT.

2. Stephon Gilmore, CB (The University of SC)-- Gilmore is big (6-1, 200) for a CB, something we need. He has good hands, tackles well, and is good at jamming WRs. Great for a second round CB. With Hogan, Munnerlyn back at nickel, Butler and Gamble, we should have a nice competition at Nickel.

3. (from Arizona) Matt McCants, OT, (UAB)—McCants has the tools to be great, but he is a bit raw at the moment. He has excellent feet, long arms, and stays on his blocks, something important when Cam is scrambling. It is time the Panthers started developing Gross’s replacement and got a legit reserve LT. McCants could also back Otah at RT, allowing Bell to go inside to G.

4. Demario Davis, OLB, (Arkansas State). At 6’3” (probably 6’2”) and 235 lbs, Davis is an assassin that runs a 4.65 40. He reminds me of Beason, a team leader, instinctive, and can play all 3 LB positions. Watch his stock, it could easily rise into the third round by the end of April. Will be a starter early in his career.

5. Bobby Rainey RB, (Western Kentucky) At 5’ 7” and 205, Rainey is a kick returner, RB, (Think Sproles) who averaged 140 yards per game. Rivera is looking for a back like this—to give the offense a new dimension and to improve special teams.

6. D’Anton Lynn, FS (CB at Penn State). Lynn might go undrafted as a CB, but as a FS, he has potential. At 6’0” and 205, he runs a 4.53 40 and is rather physical. A smart player and a leader, Lynn has the potential to turn a not-so-promising career as a CB into a solid player at FS.

7. Shawn Louiseau, MLB, (Merrimack). Louiseau is a small school special teamer with good size (6’ 0” 240) who can hit. He runs a 4.65 40, good for a MLB his size. He would be great depth behind Beason and Anderson, while combining with Davis and Rainey to make our special teams respectable again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood15

Brockers just isn't a top 10 pick, he's just not someone I feel comfortable with taking that early and hoping he is the answer to our defensive woes.

We need a guy that get to the QB, cause turnovers, and just be all around disruptive in different defensive packages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st half is good. i like the direction of the 2nd half but no opinion on the players bc i don't know anything about them.

just curious what we would have to have given up for that 3rd.

Trade the 9th pick to Arizona for #13 + their third rounder.

I am not crazy about the draft, but it was what I came up with when I ran through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it a lot. I also don't know much about the back half guys, and I'd like a P and/or K on the third day, I'd also be ok with taking Demario Davis with that acquired 3rd after watching that video in the other thread about him. Also, I like Gilmore well enough but I'd probably rather get Markelle Martin. I know that would leave our critical need at CB2 untouched but there's still FA, and probably a couple guys that could at the very least help us in the short term without breaking the bank. I wouldn't be upset with Gilmore though (if Minnifield and Jenkins are gone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who says the Cards want to trade up?

I've seen it speculated in a number of mocks, most often trading with us. The thought is that they want to be sure to get one of the top 3 OTs and trading up with us wouldn't be terribly expensive and our needs more than most justify trying to trade down (our biggest needs - CB, DT, OLB - don't have great value where we're picking, most other teams in our vicinity have a need that'll be good value.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who says the Cards want to trade up?

One of the Cardinals' biggest needs is LT. That is common knowledge. There are 3 LTs in the draft who are (arguably) starting LTs as rookies. Since Left Tackles are hard to come by and nearly as rare as franchise QBs, they are rarely drafted outside the top 10. So, one could predict that the Cards might find a third rounder worth the move. But if you want a quote from a Cardinal insider, you will not find one--teams do not share draft strategies with the press in January. If you examine their needs and the market, you can predict who might offer when your team's number comes up.

The argument against the Cards moving up is that they have several needs and no second rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...