Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Abortion, ban it or endorse it?????


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

Seems like everyone has a position on abortion these days. Some folks say its a womans right to control her body, other folks say killing a child is not anyone's right. I'd like to know what the huddle thinks...I'll kick it off, I am anti-abortion, I do in fact believe abortion is killing a child and that further folks have lately used abortion as a means for birth control......your turn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very difficult issue for me. I'm totally against it but understand the woman's rights side of the argument when it comes to rape or incest. There's no real way to figure out a time period of viability and that's the trickiest part of it all. In the end, I just think you're taking away a life; end of story.

(This may end up in the tbox)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think men should stay out of this one.

I agree, there are childless couples that would love a baby and they should be given that opportunity. We also have to consider the baby-mama's perspective. For whatever reason, she is deciding that she cannot carry the baby and that's her decision alone to make.

In the case of rape...her decision alone.

In the distant past, I have escorted a few women through the protest lines to the clinic. No, not any of mine as I don't agree with abortion (as most of you know, lol) but I do beleive in a woman's right providing it is legal.

I even got in a physical fight with a few protesters and it made the news. 3 on 1 and I came out victorious. One of the A-holes even threatened to sue me for damages to his face.

I don't think the public should fund it but there are programs that will.

Either way, men ain't got a dog in that fight and should stay out of the whole legal/not legal thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it's a woman's right, there's no way we could make exceptions for all of the scenarios out there.

that said, I sure wish more women would reconsider and at least think of all those couples out there trying desperately to have children of their own that can't.

rape and if I woman has a higher percentage to die isn't a lot of exceptions. They should have the right to have an abortion.

all the other random chicks who made "poor decisions" have already made their choice when they CHOOSE to spread there legs.

No reason for men to stay out of this issue. We all are created the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

me...If you want an abortion you should have it in the 1st trimester.

I am pro life but I my opinion should no way dictate a woman's decision. I knew that if I had ever found myself in that situation I would give my opinion but also my support for their decision either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

men should absolutely stay out of the issue.

Why?

Women don't create life on their own. Plus, like I said I believe a women has a right to choose...... and when you choose to engage in sex you excerise that right. The main function of sex is reproduction. If you choose to engage in a reproductive act for other benefits than you have made your choice already.

If you don't want it......give it up. 9-10 months of a women hating being pregnant is better than killing/ending a life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...