Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL 2012 Predictions


DeeJay

Recommended Posts

Carolina Panthers: The Cam Newton Express will have plenty of bandwagon riders jump heading into next season and rightfully so.

Just about everybody returns to the Panthers offense, while the defense gets a healthy Jon Beason back in the lineup and a Top 10 draft pick likely joining the front seven.

Newton was making the rounds at the Super Bowl, wisely saying he wasn’t satisfied with a 6-10 campaign and that he’d work hard this offseason on protecting the ball better.

Carolina could be very dangerous with a full offseason to train and prepare.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/2012-predictions-Baltimore-Ravens-Green-Bay-Packers-Super-Bowl-XLVII-020612

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is not one person on this forum that will predict anything less than a superbowl next year or risk being tarred and feathered in the public square.

Damn right and we deserve it. How many excuses can the huddle always have? We have done everything possible if we can't win at this point 1. things are not going right or 2. things are going to slow and either way it's not a good sign.

Another losing season isn't an option, let's stop ingraining losing into the fan base. Not being good enough is not being good enough no excuses. I hope to see some new faces next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...