Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bell and Keiser shine as undrafted free agent rookies for the Panthers


panthers55

Recommended Posts

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Bell-Keiser-work-their-way-into-mix/7c056b14-2ef6-4540-a93c-71bedcc17246

Both of them are getting press on the Panthers website. Does that suggest they are going to be key players moving forward or just a symptom of the slow offseason?

Both guys played significantly with Bell starting 12 games. Keiser tied for second with 4 sacks on the defensive line.

In particular Bell might be considered the primary backup/starter if Otah has issues this year. With a year under his belt is he going to be ready to challenge for the starter position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them both. For un-drafted free agents with no off season they really came in and produced fairly well. I'm more impressed with Keiser though. He had that fire in his heart. He accomplished a lot with that little time span he was with the full team. What 4 Sacks and a INT? Thats amazing for an undrafted free agent playing in like 5 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them both. For un-drafted free agents with no off season they really came in and produced fairly well. I'm more impressed with Keiser though. He had that fire in his heart. He accomplished a lot with that little time span he was with the full team. What 4 Sacks and a INT? Thats amazing for an undrafted free agent playing in like 5 games.

My thoughts exactly, and people stop bashing bell. He was an undrafted rookie who started 12 games and played against some of the NFLs top pass rushers and he gave up 4 sacks you say.....not bad to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It goes a long way to have guys that have worked their way up to the roster (not that players that were drafted didn't). I was especially impressed with how the team seemed to "protect" Bell. I had read that Smitty was helping him out along with other players. Everybody reaching down to bring a man up will go a long way :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...