Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers helmet outside the combine interview room


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

If you need further proof, here's what I would suggest:

On a hot summer day, stand on your concrete (white) driveway in your bare feet... now walk out to the asphalt (black) street and see if you feel any difference?

Ask yourself why the concrete would feel much cooler then the asphalt?

Heat results in fluid loss, fluid loss affects athletic performance, therefore anything you can do to limit fluid loss (like wearing a white jersey instead of a black jersey) is a good thing.

(I still can't believe I'm having to explain this)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you need further proof, here's what I would suggest:

On a hot summer day, stand on your concrete (white) driveway in your bare feet... now walk out to the asphalt (black) street and see if you feel any difference?

Ask yourself why the concrete would feel much cooler then the asphalt?

Heat results in fluid loss, fluid loss affects athletic performance, therefore anything you can do to limit fluid loss (like wearing a white jersey instead of a black jersey) is a good thing.

(I still can't believe I'm having to explain this)

Except there is still no evidence to support the fact that the difference between the two is detrimental to the team. None. I'd say you don't get it, but it's rather clear that you do and you don't want to concede it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Nothing. Let me say this again.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Absolutely zero. Players experience enough training, conditioning, and replenishment of nutrients that it doesn't place them at a disadvantage, and you cannot dispute that, because there is no evidence to support it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter (it's sad that I have to repeat that to you so many times). Can you make just one post, that actually deals with the topic at hand? Just one? Or will you run back to "Dude, black's hotter bro, everybody knows that, you'z so dumb"

I really, really doubt it.

It has nothing to with being hotter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking from my own experience, when I played football in highschool we had all black practice uniforms in the August heat. It sucked. They absorbed heat like a bitch, and made you pour with sweat. It felt like practicing in a sauna. It helped to condition, but every guy on the team that played JV, (who wore light blue practice jerseys), even said that those jerseys sucked worse to practice and play in. More guys cramped in practice quicker with black jerseys. Just putting it out there. FWIW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking from my own experience, when I played football in highschool we had all black practice uniforms in the August heat. It sucked. They absorbed heat like a bitch, and made you pour with sweat. It felt like practicing in a sauna. It helped to condition, but every guy on the team that played JV, (who wore light blue practice jerseys), even said that those jerseys sucked worse to practice and play in. More guys cramped in practice quicker with black jerseys. Just putting it out there. FWIW

Of course, we did the same in HS. It's done in part, to build mental toughness, on the notion that suffering from heat, is, partially, a state of mind.

That, however is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand, regardless of what CatMan would have you believe. The issue at hand is- Is the heat absorbed by a black jersey debilitating enough to be detrimental to our team? The evidence suggests that it does not,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a well known fact that darker colors trap/absorb heat while lighter colors reflect it. this is backed by physics.

it's a well known fact that wearing dark clothes in hot weather can raise your body temperature and can cause heat exhaustion, heat stroke, heat cramps, and other heat related illnesses. in hot weather, to keep off heat exhaustion (that being a professional athlete doesn't make you immune to) you should wear lighter colors. this is advice given to everyone in all activities.

if people (players) are more prone to heat issues by wearing darker colors then it makes sense that it would be detrimental to a team.

that is why all teams in warm weather and at home wear their white jerseys and force their opponents to wear darker colors. it is also why those opponents will opt to wear as light a jersey as they can when they aren't allowed to wear white.

doesn't make sense to you? can't help you.

Except there is still no evidence to support the fact that the difference between the two is detrimental to the team. None. I'd say you don't get it, but it's rather clear that you do and you don't want to concede it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Nothing. Let me say this again.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Absolutely zero. Players experience enough training, conditioning, and replenishment of nutrients that it doesn't place them at a disadvantage, and you cannot dispute that, because there is no evidence to support it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter (it's sad that I have to repeat that to you so many times). Can you make just one post, that actually deals with the topic at hand? Just one? Or will you run back to "Dude, black's hotter bro, everybody knows that, you'z so dumb"

I really, really doubt it.

It has nothing to with being hotter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're suggesting that

A) Other teams wear their light colored jerseys as often as the Panthers do for a supposed tactical advantage-they don't.

B) that the tactic actually works, which, once again, has no evidence to support it-which is the point-not any of the extra crap about black clothes being hotter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except there is still no evidence to support the fact that the difference between the two is detrimental to the team. None. I'd say you don't get it, but it's rather clear that you do and you don't want to concede it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Nothing. Let me say this again.

It has nothing to do with being hotter. Absolutely zero. Players experience enough training, conditioning, and replenishment of nutrients that it doesn't place them at a disadvantage, and you cannot dispute that, because there is no evidence to support it.

It has nothing to do with being hotter (it's sad that I have to repeat that to you so many times). Can you make just one post, that actually deals with the topic at hand? Just one? Or will you run back to "Dude, black's hotter bro, everybody knows that, you'z so dumb"

I really, really doubt it.

It has nothing to with being hotter.

So you wouldn't sweat more on a hot/sunny day in a black uniform then you would in a white uniform?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How do you expect him to step up in the pocket when Ickey is being pushed to the spot you want him to be. Stills don’t tell the entire picture.
    • They're examples of denying reality. Here are some others: ,- Bryce is the worst QB in the NFL right now (no he isn't) - Bryce is the worst QB in NFL history (no he's not; that's stupid) - Well then Bryce is at least the the worst QB in the league over the last three years (nope, he's actually improved a lot since year one, which was a turbulent year anyway) - That's not true, he hasn't Improved one but since his rookie year (oh come on) 🙄 - Well, even if he did, we can't win with him (obviously we can) - Yeah but not unless everyone else is damn near perfect (think the game film from our wins this year would back that up?) - Even so, we won those games in spite of him (officially the stupidest argument available) And no, those are made up. You can find those quotes and other equally moronic statements in various threads around the board. I know some folks always need to characterize whatever they're against as the worst thing in existence. It's hyperbole, and it's hypersilly. Likewise, you've got some who are so absolutely emotional about it that even if you think Bryce isn't good enough (which I do) they'll still call you a stan if you don't agree to label him the lousiest passer in existence 🙄 It's just dumb, and it's not realistic. But on the flipside, here are some statements which are; - Bryce is indeed capable of both playing in, and winning, an NFL game. Not on a consistent level though, and consistency is huge. - He is also capable of completing mid-range and even some deep passes; hell, he threw a beauty this past Sunday  - Yes, he has improved over his rookie season and over last year. Arguing against that is disingenuous. - Believe it or not, other players are the roster do make mistakes in games also.  - And lastly, while I know it hurts some people's narrative and arguments, Bryce does indeed deserve credit for the winning games he's played in this season. ... Every single one of those statements is true. And since i acknowledge all that, I must be in favor of keeping him in place then Except I'm not 😕 ... Don't know of anyone who doesn't think he'll get the fifth year option. Not ready to guarantee anything beyond that, though. So bottom line: Yeah, Bryce is fully expected to be our quarterback through next year. If there were a logical, realistic path to acquire a more capable starter and transition Bryce to a backup I'd be elated, but that's a pipe dream. This where we're at  I don't **** it, you don't like it, others don't either. But here We are so let's make the best of it that we can.
    • What does it matter how fast the wrs are with Bryce he is not hitting them anyway
×
×
  • Create New...