Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld belives Brian Quick is top 50 talent


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Appalachian State WR Brian Quick's two unofficial forty-yard dash times at the Combine were 4.48 and 4.53.

Quick isn't Stephen Hill, but he's got impressive speed for a 6-foot-3 1/2 and 220-pound wide receiver. While some draftniks believe he'll be a mid- to late-round pick, the NFL is higher on Quick than the media. He has a legitimate shot to go in the top 50, and today's performance will help his cause.

They also believe Streeter is extremely raw.

Miami (FL) WR Tommy Streeter ran unofficial forty-yard dash times of 4.34 and 4.38 at the NFL Combine.

At 6-foot-5, 219, he's a freak of nature. Streeter will particularly appeal to NFL teams that upgrade prospects for workout numbers. (And there are plenty of them, even in the post-Al Davis era.) In terms of production, Streeter was less impressive in college. His only big year came as a junior (2011), when Streeter caught 46 balls for 811 yards. He's a project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

..............What? :confused5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick in the second? No. He's a guy who produced against bad compeitition. Streeter? Eh. Didn't produce against good competition, but he's tall and fast and could fit our system. Hill's the same. Basically, they should be on the draft board, but there should be a lot of guys in front of them.

2 TDs against VaTech is bad competition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 TDs against VaTech is bad competition?

Grrr...looked at his stats on ESPN and saw one catch for eight yards against the only major team they played. Too bad I didn't realize that they stopped counting App State's players' stats after 2008.

Let's chalk this one up to carelessness. I'll do a little more homework on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And its two fold from there, we knew we were going to stink next year, we knew he wasnt going to play right away and we knew the 2025 rb class was absolutely fuging loaded.  So none of it made a lick of sense
    • Here for the lively debate but don’t devolve into “you don’t know the game” stuff. ..with that PSA over, I lean more to the it was a mistake camp myself.  It wasn’t a good move. Many people reference Frazier but it is was a few guys. I thought Sainristil would have been perfect for us. Although I will say, I don’t mind taking RBs high depending on the talent. It was him being injured and his talent relative to the other RBs in his tier that makes me less than thrilled about it. 
    • If you're insinuating Bryce Young is the only player people here have been critical of we don't even need to discuss any further because folks who have actually seen the threads knows that's factually incorrect. That's the issue and where the disconnect begins. You perceive an honest assessment and basic straightforward acknowledgment that while we can like the player on a personal level ultimately the pick was a mistake given what we know now and the other prospects that were available. None of that is the personal slight you perceive it to be. Honest discussion is not doom and gloom. If someone wants to reject the reality that is front of them in favor of another that is more convenient for their POV that is certainly their prerogative. What I'm trying to tell you is you are never going to find the dialogue you seek as long as this is your basis for the framework of discussion about our team. I'm not asking you to leave. I do believe you bring legitimate value here. I'm simply offering you an alternative if you insist on rolling out this same approach when the season rolls out. Because although optimism is high right now sooner or later we might hit a bump in the road. And conversations will likely get the opposite of glowing positivity. But that's alright. That's the rollercoaster of sports fandom. We'll survive.
×
×
  • Create New...