Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who shoud we target with the 7.4 million?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Thanks to the unexpected gift of 1.6 million from the skins/cowboys and the 5.8 million savings of cutting Wharton who's out there thats worth a look?

1 star player, 2-3 mid level players, what do you guys think?. I did not anticapate either of these moves so never researched too much into free agents as I didn't expect this much room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

make more room via extending smitty and stew first

then target brodrick bunkley or antonio garay

i'm not sure if that will actually happen though

but garay followed rivera to chicago and san diego...

not sure where ron edwards plays into the equation

bunkley played with mcdermott in philly for awhile

i really just want a guaranteed to be good DT and i'll be fine with the rest of free agency. and maybe some OL reworking but nothing too flashy (grubbs, winston, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has been in the NFL 3 years and still looks like a very mediocre QB. Most games are nothing but mediocre plays with a highlight reel every now and then.  He is a very INCONSISTENT QB and it’s very fustrating. He does not deserve a 5th year option, even though the Panthers and all the dumb asses in the front office will give it to him.
    • I’ve rarely ever been more sure of anything than losing out — but how can anyone say with a straight face “Bryce hasn’t improved, but Canales has and he’s masks his flaws”. You have to be so out of touch with reality to put one way above the other when discussing those two. 
    • Last night was the classic example of a visiting team just holding on through the wave of emotion a home team has at the start of a big time game. Bama’s first two kickoff returns really set them back as far as playcalling and allowed OU to dictate field position. The emotion of the home crowd fed into what OU was doing at that point, and it felt like Bama would not be able to overcome that.     Once the kickoff returner was told to fair catch every kick, the game shifted, as Bama wasn’t starting each drive inside their own 15. It was then that Bama was able to make some plays, outscoring OU 34-7 the rest of the way.  I think the last 3/4 of the game proves Bama was the better team. OU was just able to ride the initial wave of emotion to a big lead, but Bama held on just enough.  However, had OU blocked the punt on Bama’s second drive and scored a TD (vice a FG on the ensuing drive), things likely would have been different.  Anyway, Roll Tide!
×
×
  • Create New...