Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we Trade down....


Panthro

Recommended Posts

Yup, let's trade back (Cleveland #22 and #37, or NE #27 & #31) plus our #40 and get 3 of the top 40.

With release of Wharton, Cordy Glenn could be back in that mix of CB/DT/OL/LB, or possibly Floyd if they love him.

Why and who would want to trade up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If for some reason Cleveland doesn't get Flynn, I could see them sending us thier 22nd and next years 1st for number nine (to move up in front of Seattle to get Tannehill <--- if he impresses at his pro-day)

That would be ideal, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Blackmon fell to us and someone offer us a deal similar to what the falcons gave away for Julio Jones, would we take it?

I like our spot because it gives of flexibility.

With everyone who has been talked about getting drafted high, I believe one of the blue-chippers will fall to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the scenarios where no matter the team that needs to be jumped, they always come to the Panthers for a trade.

You need to get in front of Seattle at 12? Then go all the way up to 9 and trade more picks than you need to because.........the Panthers are just great guys?

Buffalo, Buffalo, Buffalo. Does anyone need to jump in front of Buffalo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the scenarios where no matter the team that needs to be jumped, they always come to the Panthers for a trade.

You need to get in front of Seattle at 12? Then go all the way up to 9 and trade more picks than you need to because.........the Panthers are just great guys?

Buffalo, Buffalo, Buffalo. Does anyone need to jump in front of Buffalo?

fug man, let us dream ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are talking to the right guys. Weve got meetings with Cox, Brockers, Floyd. Prepping for different scenarios....I like it

Agreed.

There is one level of players that ends around the 5th pick. The next tier of players ends at around 16 or so. Hope we don't drop any lower than that pick.

That tier has guys like Ingram, Poe, DeCastro, Floyd, Keuchley, Coples Rieff in it.

Best and most likely scenario for a trade down would be for Rieff to drop to us and knowing that Buffalo could use the guy have suitors want to move up to us for trade. I am thinking AZ who just got rid of Levi Brown. Would get us a third and keep us in the running for the same set of guys we could get at pick #9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't mind if we could get an extra 2nd round pick or a 3rd round pick for this draft plus something extra for next year's.

Then you might be looking at a drop to 30 or so to be getting next years picks along with a 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Blackmon fell to us and someone offer us a deal similar to what the falcons gave away for Julio Jones, would we take it?

I like our spot because it gives of flexibility.

With everyone who has been talked about getting drafted high, I believe one of the blue-chippers will fall to us.

Man I hope we'd take it... how awesome would it be to rape another team for picks like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...