Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is There Any Merit In Trying To Deal Otah To Philadelphia?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

I can't think of one team that would want Otah as is. If he performs well this season, then yes. But we'll keep him if he did that.

I can think of a lot that would want him....all 31 teams would want him if cut and cheap. Why wouldn't you want a pro bowl caliber tackle when on the field who has no off field or lockerroom issues.

If Carolina was 100% sure they were going to start someone else they should still keep Otah this year. great depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of a lot that would want him....all 31 teams would want him if cut and cheap. Why wouldn't you want a pro bowl caliber tackle when on the field who has no off field or lockerroom issues.

If Carolina was 100% sure they were going to start someone else they should still keep Otah this year. great depth.

Because he's never been to the Pro Bowl, is more broke down than your grandpa's rusty Dodge, and isn't worth the contract his agent will ask for. Now if you can get him on the cheap, sure. But he won't do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if philadelphia offers a fifth do you take it?

No, because if he has a great year and walks, then we'll get a higher compensatory pick. He's a top 10 RT when he's healthy, and if he gets hurt again next season, then the risk was worth the potential reward.

I think people are failing to realize that he was placed on IR last year as a preventative measure. They didn't do it because he was re-injured, they did it to give him the rest of the year to heal so they can keep him long term.

This board has a much dimmer view of Otah than the team does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...