Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tanard Jackson?


chknwing

Recommended Posts

wtf.. so Claiborne isn't a good option but an old vet who failed a physical would be...

makes perfect sense..

Not sure what Claiborne has to do with it but Jackson is by no means old....he's 26

I'd bet his release has much less to do with a physical and more to do with his attitude so no thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what Claiborne has to do with it but Jackson is by no means old....he's 26

I'd bet his release has much less to do with a physical and more to do with his attitude so no thanks.

relates to another thread about Claiborne.. the point still remains..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what Claiborne has to do with it but Jackson is by no means old....he's 26

I'd bet his release has much less to do with a physical and more to do with his attitude so no thanks.

bleys is trolling because I do not share his man crush for Claiborne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bleys is trolling because I do not share his man crush for Claiborne

I haven't once stated I want Claiborne (although I think it can go unsaid).. however, you're flawed logic is definitely worth pointing out... and so I have (in both threads)..

try not to use the trolling card too often, it should be reserved for legitimate trolling, instead of trying to derail legitimate questions upon one's thought process..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson had surgery on his shoulder. They didn't want to give him the time that it takes for the shoulder to heal, and they released him because "they are going in a different direction". But, he is expected to be back 100 percent before the season. Per NFL.com:

Just three months removed from shoulder surgery, Jackson's timeline would not have permitted him to be ready to pass a physical at this time, his agent, Peter Schaffer, told NFL Network insider Jason La Canfora. Schaffer said Jackson will be 100 percent recovered this offseason and anticipates several teams being interested in the young safety, who has been an impact player when healthy.

Jackson is a decent corner with some upside, IMO. I would definitely list him B-Stock with A potential. The thing is is that he has had some injury issues:

"Man, my shoulder been injured since '09 and something that I put off and I played through a series of injuries," Jackson said. "Not to make excuses for the way I played, but I had a lot of injuries last year, two bad hamstrings and a torn rotator cuff. My body feels good right now. Obviously, there's more work to do but I'll be ready to play football."

Probably won't demand a whole lot monetarily. May be worth a flier, even with the recent pick-ups, but I'd kinda be surprised if we show interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its the offseason, why they giving him a physical in april? if he came to training camp completly out of shape, thats one thing, but its april.

They give physicals before a player shows up for offseason workouts which start this month. Plus if you are going to retain players or let them go you give them a physical first. Because if you release guys, if they are hurt because of a football related injury, you have to offer them an injury settlement I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sign Tarnard Jackson?

Before signing Reggie Smith- No.

After signing Reggie Smith- lol with what money?

I'm pretty sure Steve's extension freed up 5 million and on June 1st we get another 6 million from cutting Wharton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Release Martin and pick him up. That would be good to me.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/auto/09000d5d82481ed5/Martin-seals-Panthers-win

From now on anytime someone talks poo on Sherrod, I think I'll post that video. Not saying the dude is the answer at Safety but, he has some moves and is not that bad. Definitely better than Tanard Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...