Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gas, Cars, & Etc.


davos

Recommended Posts

So I go to the pump today and for the first time ever paid over 70.00 to fill up my truck. I don't necessarily want to get rid of it but these prices are starting to make me go arghh!! I was wondering if any of you truck/suv drivers like me would consider trading down for a more gas friendly ride?

If I'd ever do that, I'd probably look to a Subaru Legacy, Infiniti G37 or Acura TSX

So would bumping up from around 16 to 24 mpg be worth it if the trade is reasonable? or should I stick with my double cab?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drive a Tahoe and it cost me over 90 to fill up the other day. I've always joked about getting something like a Chevy Volt next...but I'm starting to seriously think about it. Gas prices are never going back down far enough to make a difference.

My mom has a G35 and while it's obviously a tad different than the G37, I love it. Sensitive brake but you get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drive a Tahoe and it cost me over 90 to fill up the other day. I've always joked about getting something like a Chevy Volt next...but I'm starting to seriously think about it. Gas prices are never going back down far enough to make a difference.

My mom has a G35 and while it's obviously a tad different than the G37, I love it. Sensitive brake but you get used to it.

Yeah I'm finally starting to think seriously about because I'm at 65,000 miles in 6 years with it and never had a problem. Its in great shape so the bluebook is still fine (like 16,500) especially if I can get rid of it through a credit union deal. Its just the dent of gas prices are more easily felt by the month and if I can reduce it, its only beneficial. I'm not even using my bed much anymore :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The math pretty much never works out to make a move simply for gas mileage, but if you're considering moving from a truck to a car anyway IMO and IME it's absolutely worth it. I owned an Explorer for 8 years (~ 15 mpg) and went to a Legacy (consistently 27 mpg) and now fill up pretty much 1/2 as often depending on my city/hwy mix. I thought I might miss my Explorer, but I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The math pretty much never works out to make a move simply for gas mileage, but if you're considering moving from a truck to a car anyway IMO and IME it's absolutely worth it. I owned an Explorer for 8 years (~ 15 mpg) and went to a Legacy (consistently 27 mpg) and now fill up pretty much 1/2 as often depending on my city/hwy mix. I thought I might miss my Explorer, but I don't.

damn I didn't realize the Legacy was that high...if its that close enough to 30 I'd seriously consider it

hmm...gonna have to do some research but if I'm doing this, I'm def doing it before the summer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

damn I didn't realize the Legacy was that high...if its that close enough to 30 I'd seriously consider it

hmm...gonna have to do some research but if I'm doing this, I'm def doing it before the summer

Yeah, the 2.5i trim of the new model (2010 and newer) has a CVT option that EPAs 23 city/31highway (the manual is 19/29 I think), and it's held true for me. The engine is a 170 hp 4-cylinder, so it's not a race car by any means, but I find the acceleration more than adequate and the handling and all-time AWD are phenomenal. My wife's Focus is somewhat useless in the snow, so my requirements were 4WD/AWD (and not the crappy 90/10 kind) and solid mileage. The Legacy isn't going to go places in feet of snow, but no problem in 6-8" of powder and the rain traction is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My truck now takes 70-80 to fill up about once a week, but I'm not selling yet. Unfortunately, once you go truck, it's hard to go back. Only way I'm selling and converting to a small car is if gas really goes crazy. If it breaks $6 I'll think about it.

Like B.B. said though, I have been thinking about getting a motorcycle to commute to work. My area is flooded with dirtbikes that can easily and cheaply be converted to be street-legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...