Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Rank: Panthers Will Win Nfc South


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

Party for Panthers in NFC South; sorry, Saints and Falcons

There is going to be a changing of guard in the NFC South.

I'm already on record saying the Panthers will get off to a hot start. I might as well take it one step further: The Panthers will win the NFC South, and the Saints and Falcons will both miss the playoffs.

The Bears likely would have made the playoffs last year if Jay Cutler had stayed healthy, and they are postseason-bound in 2012. In fact, the two wild-card teams will come from the NFC North.

lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. I think we can take it if the Falcons have the same kind of playoff hangover that plagued us in 2009. You know, Jake threw 5 INTs in that playoff game against the Cards and then the next season he was still psyched out/discouraged by it and threw 18 INTs over 11 games. I'm hoping the same deal will happen with the Falcons; they couldn't score save for a safety against the Giants so all next season it gets in their heads and they have recurring problems putting points on the board.

If that's he case, I think we have a shot at winning the South. If not, we're definitely going to be in the hunt for a wildcard spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Rank's attempts at humorous articles are always terrible, but when it comes to just stating opinions and analysis he's as good (or bad) as most of the rest of them in my opinion. To me, this is just an example of someone making a bold statement so that if it comes true they look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also said that the Panthers will win the division.

His opinion doesn't mean any more than mine does. It's somebody's opinion.

Just because he's employed by NFL.com doesn't mean that his opinion carries more weight than mine, and I'm in the US Army.

Nobody is saying it does. Just funny to hear, especially from NFL.com.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the love of god please don't mention this game that never happened. This game that never occurred still hurts very much.

Just remember that that game that never happened was the start of a series of events that led us to..... :cam:

So cheer up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are going to be some ugly records this season in the NFC south, and that tiebreakers are going to vital.

Much like the NFC East was last season.

I just hope the Saints crumble and don't rally around the "us against the world and everyone is writing us off" crap.

I really think the falcons regress this season, and questions arise about Mike Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 31st rushing D and 8 carries by Rico is coaching.  Rico is easily the best offensive weapon right now and it’s not really close.  *literally everyone knows Dalton is washed, horrible and shouldn’t even be a backup QB.   Drive 1? ZERO carries.  Coaching.  Drive 2 - Rico was playing great.   Did Canales lean into that or go for “balance”? Coaching. Drive 3 - ZERO carries.  Coaching  Drive 4 - 1 carry and opted for Jimmy Horn gadget rush (you can’t stick  with the Horn repetitive gadget runs each week and that’s not a better idea than getting Rico going)  Drive 5 - basically Dalton heavy as the half expired.  I don’t need to watch a game to know it’s coaching.  The gameplan wasn’t about setting Rico up to go off on a trash rush D.  It was bullshit harmony balance of the rush and the pass and making Hubbard feel good.
    • In the locker room after the Dallas game, multiple  players said FEED him when Canales mentioned Rico stats. That already made me think even the locker room wouldn't care if Rico got the touches rn. This is on Canales indeed and I agree n the Qb take.  We aren't winning  bc of Bryce  but he has been managing it. Had the Jets had Qb aptitude,  we could've probably  lost that game too. All they would've needed is 14 points. Regardless, we got a team  that's being built up and that position needs an overhaul. 
    • I think he was trying to mimic the Lions with Montgomery and Gibbs. They are just more of the exception to the rule and Brooks was too much of a gamble to be a Gibbs type player. The Lions also didn’t sign Montgomery and draft Gibbs until their offense was nearly set. It was more of a luxury take the offense to the next level type of deal. 
×
×
  • Create New...