Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everette Brown = SAM?


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Could Everette Brown be converted into a SAM linebacker?

Diggs did an okay job this past year, but it seems to me that Brown could be a nasty SAM linebacker at 6'1" 256 with his kind of burst and strength. The only question would be whether or not he can play coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we traded our first round pick in '10 to get an impressive pass rushing DE and convert him into an oversized OLB that can't drop into coverage effectively, when we already have impressive LB depth, I am going to be really pissed.

That would deffinetly drop our draft grade to a D.

So, I really doubt that converting Brown into an OLB is anywhere in our future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we really have "impressive" LB depth? Dan Connor is an exciting prospect but we haven't even seen the guy play. Diggs held things down last year but he's not getting any younger and Landon Johnson lost out a starting job to Diggs in training camp.

I agree that if anyone can get production out of an undersized DE it's Meeks, but we don't know whether or not Brown can play coverage since he wasn't asked to do that @ FSU. It would stand to reason that a guy with his kind of speed and agility is capable of playing coverage. I don't think it's a waste to use a 1st round pick on a SAM that can rush the passer.... lots of teams use 1st round picks on OLB prospects. Do we know that under Meeks we won't blitz the LB's more?

I'm playing devil's advocate here, not saying anyone's opinion is right or wrong. I do think it would be interesting to see what a guy like Brown can do as a SAM and I'd imagine the Panthers have considered that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no, where the hell do people come up with crap like this?

Diggs was more than ok last year, he played quite well after moving from the weak side to the strong side.

Plus, we still have Dan Conner.

You know, that's the problem with this board - someone posts an idea and right away people jump in and call it "crap".

I've played and coached football for many years and the idea of Brown possibly being converted to a SAM OLB is not "crap". If you think it's a ridiculous idea then you obviously don't know much about football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's already been told by the coaching staff that his job is to "put his hand in the dirt" and "rush the passer".

So no.

And coaching staffs never tell you one thing and then do another, right?

I think if it becomes clear that Brown doesn't have the stuff to get to the QB at the NFL level, then converting him to a SAM OLB would be under serious consideration, especially given our situation at that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no, where the hell do people come up with crap like this?

Diggs was more than ok last year, he played quite well after moving from the weak side to the strong side.

Plus, we still have Dan Conner.

I agree, that is crazy! Anywho, I was thinking maybe we could convert Duke Robinson to FB, Brown to nickel CB, and finally address the QB issue by converting our 7th rounder into our new starting QB ( I heard he played some in middle school).

........I'm off to find a thread about the possibility of moving to a 3-4 or why Peppers is the anti-christ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And coaching staffs never tell you one thing and then do another, right?

I think if it becomes clear that Brown doesn't have the stuff to get to the QB at the NFL level, then converting him to a SAM OLB would be under serious consideration, especially given our situation at that position.

I think that you would have a viable arguement if we were a 3-4 D but we are a 4-3 D. Ron Meeks D's have historically had undersized DE's that are good at getting to the QB, DT's that are big and strong but not overly athletic and can handle two OL long enough for the LB's to get into position, LB's that are not massive but more built on speed and great tackling, CB's and Safety's that are more smart than freakish athletes.

If you look at that model then Brown fits in with a Meeks' DE perfectly.

Our LB depth is "impressive" because any of our backups, Anderson, Johnson, and Connor can play just about any of the 3 LB positions. They may not be Pro-bowlers but they can all play effectively if needed, and all 3 could possibly start for a lot of teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His footwork has been discussed at length, just like Cam's was--no argument from me there. What I'm asking for is a statistical indicator that supports the idea that Bryce's footwork is creating meaningful issues. With Cam, we could clearly correlate occasional high passes to footwork problems. With Bryce, there are occasional misfires as well, but we aren't seeing it surface with the frequency of severity you'd expect if it were such a persistent issue. That's why when concerns about his footwork and height are paired together, there should be some measurable statistical impact. That's what I keep coming back to. That same inconsistency shows up in the deep ball critique. Saying "he misses guys outright" suggests he either isn't seeing them or can't hit them downfield... yet, as we've already seen, he was top-10 in catchable passes over 20+ yards. If accuracy were truly the issue, it should reflect in the data. It's also worth pointing out that deep-ball concerns largely became the next talking point after he made it through the season without the durability disaster some were predicting (despite being sacked for what was then the second-most times ever for a rookie QB). As for those sideline throws you mentioned: what specific throws are you referring to? If you can identify them, I'd be happy to pull up the PFF premium grades or grab All-22 clips from NFL Pro to look at those sequences and assess how real that concern is. For my part, I'd actually like to see improvement in the intermediate game. That was a strength his rookie year, but he seemed to trade it for a stronger deep game this past season. Could that shift relate to height and footwork? Maybe! But again... we'd need data or film trends to verify that rather than assume it. On the "top-10" classification front: I know that it's a moving target for most people. That's why I've been asking for specifics. Without a shared definition, it's hard to engage meaningfully. So with you moving away from raw yardage, does that mean your preferred KPIs are now height, weight, red zone efficiency, and point differential? If so, that's totally fine (just being clear about it helps). That said... red zone success and point differential depend heavily on OL play, WR execution, coaching decisions, defense (for point differential), etc. They're influenced by the QB but not exclusively determined by him... which, like passing yards, makes them more difficult to isolate for analysis of Bryce's performance.
    • I think "amazing" is basically relating to his prior performances, which is a very low bar. Even at his peak(so far), he hasn't consistently been an elite performer either by the simple eye test nor statistically. Regardless, we have seen the flashes of WHY we drafted him #1 overall and he is visibility significantly more confident. Hopefully he has spent an inordinate amount of time this offseason getting that footwork better and more consistent. That's going to be a massive factor in his continuing improvement.
×
×
  • Create New...