Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wait Wait Wait... Lets All Take A Moment To Laugh At The Bucs.. & While Were At It The Falcons, And Saints* Too.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

As if not having the Falcons and the Saints* picking in the first round was enough of a pleasure this draft, the Buccaneers robbed THEMSELVES of one of the six elite prospects and drafted a type of safety that is slowly being phased out of the league. On top of that they TRADED up for a RB.

Bahahaha.

Lets get Jenkins and close this draft out for our NFC South brethren. We just got a 12 - 15 year stud in Kuechly and if we get Jenkins we got a potential shutdown CB if he follows and listens to his teammates as they guide him on his NFL journey.

Oh and another laugh at the Buc's picks, could it have gotten any better? They get a 4th round pick for giving up Mo Claiborne.

wesley-laughing-gif.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As if not having the Falcons and the Saints* picking in the first round was enough of a pleasure this draft, the Buccaneers robbed THEMSELVES of one of the six elite prospects and drafted a type of safety that is slowly being phased out of the league. On top of that they TRADED up for a RB.

Bahahaha.

Lets get Jenkins and close this draft out for our NFC South brethren. We just got a 12 - 15 year stud in Kuechly and if we get Jenkins we got a potential shutdown CB if he follows and listens to his teammates as they guide him on his NFL journey.

Oh and another laugh at the Buc's picks, could it have gotten any better? They get a 4th round pick for giving up Mo Claiborne.

wesley-laughing-gif.gif

My sentiments exactly. I want JJ in the 2nd.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arent you the one that started a thread about how it was an amazing connection that Andrew Luck was going to the Colts because horseshoes are considered lucky? Yea.... you were...

No I ABSOLUTELY was NOT. I'd challenge u to find it, but it doesn't exist.

That's twice you've failed in one thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For now I agree with OP. I texted my Buc fan buddy afterward, as much as I didn't agree with our pick at least we didn't trade ourselves out of taking Claiborne and take a Safety with a top 10 pick. Barron will be solid and all, but I think he was severely overdrafted. I don't think he's the next Polomalu or anything like some people are saying. I won't hate on the trade up for the RB, because if I recall correctly they didn't give much to move up (think it was like a 4th round pick?). They needed a RB and apparently they correctly guessed the Giants were going to take one, so they gave up a measly 4th round pick to get the one left they wanted. But still, it hasn't been a high impact draft for them so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I ABSOLUTELY was NOT. I'd challenge u to find it, but it doesn't exist.

That's twice you've failed in one thread.

So I'm sitting here watching Sports Center and on the eve of the draft spent some time reflecting on lat year, and this is what I came up with...

We'll never really know why Luck stayed at Stanford last year. We could speculate that he wanted to finish school (I don't believe this theory) or that he simply didn't want to play for the 2-14 Carolina Panthers (my theory)

Which brings me to my whole point, and I find it pretty ironic and funny.

Had Luck come out last year, he would have been in great shape, with several weapons at his disposal.

Now though, he's going to a Colts team that just got absolutely gutted! I mean they have Wayne and that's about it.

I just thought that it was pretty ironic, and I'm glad he stayed In school, after all, we have Cam. I'm really glad it worked out the way it did... I just wonder ifLuck could do it over again, I bet he would.

Oh im sorry, you're the one with abandonment issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh im sorry, you're the one with abandonment issues.

Your thread is pooty and u know it.

It's also redundant... Meaning that this is a repeat thread! The original was created more than 2 hours prior to your thread.

I guess that makes u the one with reading comprehension issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...