Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Kearse?

Coheed

By Coheed,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Coheed Proficient

Coheed

Posted
Posted

I keep hearing about him in DT discussions, and seems that a lot of people like him. I live in Northern Virginia, and try to catch as many games as I can, but I never really got a good look at Kearse.

But yeah, was just curious as to his style, what he did/didn't do well. (specifics, I guess. I should have payed more attention when I could have)

Plus, I think he has a badass name.

Frank Kearse just sounds defensive tackle-ish.

I'm really curious about the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coheed Proficient

Coheed

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah I've heard a lot about him being the best on our team. Big boy, man. I really hope he keeps it up and does well, then. Where would you guys say he is in respect to the position itself? Possibly starter worthy one day or backup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
megadeth078 Newbie

megadeth078

Posted
Posted

Yeah I've heard a lot about him being the best on our team. Big boy, man. I really hope he keeps it up and does well, then. Where would you guys say he is in respect to the position itself? Possibly starter worthy one day or backup?

With Rivera, hopefully we can develop young FAs instead of watching them decline every season until they're cut.

I can't wait to see how Kearse plays next season. Our team is talking about developing him as if he's a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I like Kearse, but I like Neblett much better. He's going into his 3rd year, and I truly believe it could be his break out year.

Neblett is a stud and should be our starting 3 technique, if you ask me. His pro day (2010) measurables.

Height: 6000

Weight: 297

Bench Press: 33

Vertical Jump: 30.5"

40 T: 4.93

That is a pretty good athlete.

McClain, a third round pick with similar collegiate stats:

Height: 6015

Weight: 291

Vertical Jump: 28"

40 T: 4.96

I think we have the makings of a pair of stud 3 technique DTs. We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

Neblett is a stud and should be our starting 3 technique, if you ask me. His pro day (2010) measurables.

Height: 6000

Weight: 297

Bench Press: 33

Vertical Jump: 30.5"

40 T: 4.93

That is a pretty good athlete.

McClain, a third round pick with similar collegiate stats:

Height: 6015

Weight: 291

Vertical Jump: 28"

40 T: 4.96

I think we have the makings of a pair of stud 3 technique DTs. We shall see.

They are more UT's no?

Also Shirley and Kearse are going to be the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kuech the Sneak Newbie

Kuech the Sneak

Posted
Posted

They are more UT's no?

Also Shirley and Kearse are going to be the future.

I think with an offseason of work to work on strength and technique will do wonders for Shirley, kearse, McClain and fua. But having shirley and kearse in the middle would be great, they already have the size, they look much more intimidating in the middle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ivan The Awesome Mentor

Ivan The Awesome

Posted
Posted

I think with an offseason of work to work on strength and technique will do wonders for Shirley, kearse, McClain and fua. But having shirley and kearse in the middle would be great, they already have the size, they look much more intimidating in the middle

True. Very true. Which is why I'm freaking excited about actually having an Offseason and mini camps and OTA's. This should help them out a ton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...