Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

20 Of Our 22 Starters Were Originally Drafted By Us

CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

Ken Newbie

Ken

Posted
Posted

We'll see how it comes together.

Teams like GB, Pitt have been doing that for years, hopefully we'll have similar results in the future as we actually have a franchise QB now, which helps a TON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CollegePanther Newbie

CollegePanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Surely you see that this hasn't actually been a good thing.

How so, we got our franchise QB and were finally on our way to going somewhere. I think Cam, Smitty, J Stew, D Will, Kalil, Gross, Beason, Gamble, Anderson, and CJ are a pretty solid core to build around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

we were 2-14 and 6-10....dont pop the champagne yet

2-12 was under the John Fox era and the same year we prepped for the lockout. The 6-10 record was under a rookie head coach with no offseason to prep his team. I have been going back and watching all the games from last year. So far I have made it to the Chicago game. We Could/Should have easily beat AZ if it weren't for a couple blown coverages that led to wide open TD's and the embarrassing easy return Patrick Peterson made. We hung tight with G.B but did deserve to lose to that one. Chicago game was another one that minus a few unfortunate penalties and special teams meltdown would have been a win. The future is Bright with this squad that has been mostly drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • strato
      Panthers 2026 schedule

      By strato · Posted

      I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • strato
      Joe Person Draft Weekend inside info

      By strato · Posted

      Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...