Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Do We Always Have One Of The Toughest Schedules?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I was having this discussion with one of my friends recently and I told him how over the last decade or so, the Patriots have had one of the easier schedules in the league, yet we are constantly getting hit with one of the toughest. I don't remember the last time schedules were released and I read that we had anything below 14th toughest.

My friend tried to reason that it was because our division is tougher. But, that wasn't always the case, and I'd argue that the Patriots have it just as tough within their own division. Not to mention, I don't recall the Falcons, Bucs, and Saints* having a schedule equal to ours in "toughness" on a regular basis like we have... Then again, I could care less about when their schedules come out, so I could be wrong. And aside from that, I know each division has to play every opponent from another division each year, so those parts of the schedule are identical (within your own division and against selected division).

What is the reason, if there is one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're in a strong division in a strong conference: we'll never have a weak schedule without the division tanking.

You also have to remember that their were fewer good teams in the AFC over the last few years, so the AFC East, South and North typically only had one good team while the NFC North, South and East all had two or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically, it's not that our opponents are that much tougher, it's just that we suck every year, lol.

LOL, naw, it's just that the competition is always tough in our conference. It's like the NFC North. Look at their division. It's tough. Look at the AFC North and East. It's competition. Besides, Panthers should have split with the Falcons and Saints* last year. But they shot themselves in the foot. Chalk it up to rookie everything. Coaches, QB's, DT's, etc.

With the Saints*, Falcons and now the Bucs that seem to have a pulled themselves together. It's just tough to win our division. Then throw in whatever conference outside the NFC south the panthers has to play. It's tough man. If this was an easy division the schedule would be easier. It's just that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year our actual SOS was 22nd after all games were played......so that's really not a tough at all.

Pre season SOS is meaningless

Good point, as I am referring to the pre-season SOS.

But, you're right... You can't put a lot into SOS period, as your performance as a team ultimately determines your SOS. You lose, it was tough... You win, it wasn't. There are always teams that you know will come out and perform consistently - Steelers, Pats, Ravens, usually the Eagles, but other than those, there aren't many teams that give weight to the SOS argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it, it doesn't matter what teams we play. Play to win. Besides, the better teams we play, the better our team will become. Which ever way you cut it, every team has talent and a chance to win.

Pats do have a walk-into-the-playoffs schedule this year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...