Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam At Preakness


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Cam's looking swagalicious.

Also, I'd rather he have a steady girlfriend than be off chasing tail all the time. I imagine it will benefit the team if Cam can consistently ......er..... "release the pressure" before games.

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appease her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appeasIe her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

I'm guessing you are not a hit with the ladies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are so wrong, where to begin.

Having a steady gf means he is emotionally attached & never fully focused on football. Cam doesn't need some girl in his head. As a woman she is programmed to control his life, annoy him, take up his free time, & demand attention. He will always be doing things to appease her. If he is single he can bang all the bad bitches & strange he wants with no emotional attachment & without having to do all the loving & caring bullshit. He can bust a nut & call her a cab. No spooning & cuddling all night. Also, he doesn't have to "chase tail" like us peasants. He is Cam Newton; his swag is to the moon.

You say emotionally attached, I think emotionally supported. I think it'd be good for Cam to have someone other than a Gatorade towel to turn to after a tough loss. I don't think a girl would get in his head because, there's nothing in Cam's head but football. As for girls being programmed to annoy, control and demand attention, yeah psycho bitches maybe. But assuming this chick in purple isn't one of those then he's in the clear.

Moreover, even though Cam's a celebrity isn't not like he can get laid at will. He still has to go out, find a girl, spit some game and then take them home. Compare that to just rolling over and getting it on with a girlfriend. That's valuable time saved that can be spent on watching film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...