Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

darren woodson says carolina wins nfc south


philw5289

Recommended Posts

a definite possibility. its gonna come down to the D if you ask me

agreed and i think this D makes a turnaround similar to what the offense did last year.

panthers defense will be a top 10 defense by the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed and i think this D makes a turnaround similar to what the offense did last year.

panthers defense will be a top 10 defense by the end of the year.

I believe the personnel is in place and I believe in Riv so I gotta agree here. And about time too. I love me some Panthers Defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without a doubt.

I like that when he names the top three he says, "my surprise #1 in a moment..."

I thought it was going to be the Jets....

Ha. you made me watch it. What was he thinking? There are only four dude.

Coming from a defensive player and a safety no less, the pick means nothing to me but he would pick apart our DB's if he thought he could. That he did not says something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if the D can be even modestly better this year than it was in 2010, we'll for sure be contenders. I just think our offense is going to be a beast to try and contain, and if our real BEAST can come back and stop the other teams from turning things into a shooting match, Cam & Co. will take care of the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I'm impressed we made it this far into this thread without someone yelling about how we fail miserably every time someone predicts us to win something. For a while there I was pretty sure we had a bot that did it automatically...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...