Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Direct, Dish or AT&T


PantherPhann89

Recommended Posts

I've never had any problems with directv, other than getting a bad receiver with the initial install. The sent a new one quick, and I got to keep all te cables from the old one so I got an extra hdmi out of it. I'd almost rather have rabbit ears and a computer over Time Warner. My folks had dish for a long time and it seemed like they lost signal and/or quality during bad weather more than I have with directv, but that could be where they lived I imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if u want the most bang for ur buck, go with dish. if you have multiple HD tvs, The Hopper/Joey system is the way to go. HDDVR in up to 4 rooms. heh I am a dish employee and I'm not even allowed to get a hopper/joey system until the end of july.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uverse is great if you dont have more then 4 tvs (3 HD streams, 4 SD streams) with no contract to sign You get a ton of channels you would pay more for with other companies including NFL channel. If you have to have Sunday Ticket go with Direct and sign into that 2yr contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...