Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Direct, Dish or AT&T

PantherPhann89

By PantherPhann89,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

cptx Rising Star

cptx

Posted
Posted

I've never had any problems with directv, other than getting a bad receiver with the initial install. The sent a new one quick, and I got to keep all te cables from the old one so I got an extra hdmi out of it. I'd almost rather have rabbit ears and a computer over Time Warner. My folks had dish for a long time and it seemed like they lost signal and/or quality during bad weather more than I have with directv, but that could be where they lived I imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Veteran

chknwing

Posted
Posted

if u want the most bang for ur buck, go with dish. if you have multiple HD tvs, The Hopper/Joey system is the way to go. HDDVR in up to 4 rooms. heh I am a dish employee and I'm not even allowed to get a hopper/joey system until the end of july.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gat Newbie

Gat

Posted
Posted

Uverse is great if you dont have more then 4 tvs (3 HD streams, 4 SD streams) with no contract to sign You get a ton of channels you would pay more for with other companies including NFL channel. If you have to have Sunday Ticket go with Direct and sign into that 2yr contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...