Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Xbox and Playstation to Block Used Games


Wyank

Recommended Posts

Diablo III actually makes sense because of the RMAH and it's basically an MMO with a single player campaign. I wouldn't buy it and the backlash has been huge, but if you looked at what Ubisoft did with ACII for the PC and other games, no one bought them, they just pirated the warez versions instead, so they took it out. We win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooools

weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they do this it will put Game Stop out of business, selling used games and consoles is where they make the bulk of their money, they do not make hardly anything off selling new ones, this is a serious case of big business killing jobs to help their bottom line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been a console gamer all my life, love it. I have a PC and play it when the kick ass games are only available for PC but I prefer consoles, especially for FPSs. If they ban used games that will be the end for me, that is discustingly greedy. I think the idea of having to buy a code for the online version is a much much better idea. I understand why they are doing all this, it's the same reason movies are not worth poo anymore, but at the same time banning used games altogether is NOT the answer.

I will buy a new gaming PC as soon as I know for sure about this...which makes me sad but at the same time if the hot titles are going to be games like COD and madden, games they scrap cheapily together to be able to release a new one every 11 months, and liscensing that can be purchased to ensure monopolies...banning buying a turd used instead of new is jsut too much for me. I have no problem going back to being a PC gamer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People still play on consoles?
I think what the console makers don't understand is that they are blurring the lines between console and PC games. I largely stayed with console games for so long because I didn't have to deal with things like constant patching (i.e. a terrible product out the door), online verification of ownership of the game, etc. They are just killing their market with this. LIke I said I still played some games on PC, but now this will ultimately push me to play ALL games on PC.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tumblr_lgzqj7UdD91qd10xu.gif

It's not the gaming itself, obviously a PC offers much better options and online play, what I forgot to mention mommy and daddy don't buy my computers and also it gets old getting beat by a better connection/FPS/graphics etc.

Much easier to see some gaming talent on a console IMO, much more level playing ground.

I compete, not just play and if you want to compete at some PC gaming, and want to be decent you will need some $, no exceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...