Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

who are the top 3 toughest divisons in football in 2012


panther4life

Recommended Posts

You can use this nfl.com link as a reference point if need be http://www.nfl.com/s...G&split=Overall

Out of the 8, I immediately dismiss the AFC South, Then both west divisons.

Then it gets tough

I think the AFC North(Steelers,Ravens,Bengals and Browns) is the Class of the AFC with the AFC East(Bills,Patriots,Jets, and Dolphins) not too far behind.

The Class of thje NFC is a toss up between the South, North(Bears,Lions,Packers and Vikings) and East(Cowboys,Giants,Eagles,and Skins).

I honestly can't rank them once down to those 5. Try and put your rankings together and see if theres a consensus.

should be a fun offseason challenge to kill some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until the Panthers convert potential into wins, the falcons prove they can win a playoff game, and the bucs win more than 8, considering the NFCS one of the top 5 divisions is a wee bit homerish.

Id go with

NFCN

AFCN

AFCE

I don't think its homerish at all to consider the South better than either west division or the AFC south, would you honestly rank any of those divsions better than the NFC South?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As evidenced the past few years the NFC East should be the toughest in the league. Every year they beat up on each other and drive down overall records. This last year the entire division was decided by 1 game. Next up would be the tough one, solely based on Tampa and Carolinas recent struggles and the Norths ability to beat the South I give them the nod.

The AFC is pretty cut and dry, East and North rule that conference.

Soooo.... Pretty much the North and the East out of both conferences.

PS: The NFC South will take over as the toughest in all of football all because of :cam:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its homerish at all to consider the South better than either west division or the AFC south, would you honestly rank any of those divsions better than the NFC South?

Id say the only slam dunk worse division right now is the AFCS. I think that the AFCW is only slightly worse and with Manning out there now that changes the way you judge that division. NFCW is about even in my book.

Maybe we are the top of the bottom half but there is no way we are in the top half.

not yet anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until the Panthers convert potential into wins, the falcons prove they can win a playoff game, and the bucs win more than 8, considering the NFCS one of the top 5 divisions is a wee bit homerish.

Id go with

NFCN

AFCN

AFCE

you say this and list the afc east

notsureifserious.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on last year...

AFC North- The AFC North had three teams make the playoffs last year in the Steelers, Ravens, and Bengals

NFC North- Detroit and Green Bay dominated that division last year.

NFC South- The Saint's and Falcons were on top of their games last year.

This year, in my opinion

NFC North- The Lions, Packers, and Bears all have the ability to make the playoffs this year.

AFC North- Like the other two divisions, the AFC North has three teams in the Steelers, Ravens, and Bengals that can make the playoffs.

NFC East- The Giants and Eagles seem to be the favorites, but everyone in the North has a shot at that division this year.

The reason I don't have the NFC South up there is because I only think one team will make the playoffs from the NFC South, it will be us or the Falcons.

I think the Falcons will be decline a little bit from last year and the Saints**** will be significantly worse. I personally think we can go 11-5, and I see the Bucs as a five win team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is like when you go to da buffet at da Golden Corral and dey have all dis food and you get the same thing every time.   There is probably something you would like more, but you go to da same ol racks and get da same ol food every time.  Not sure why I am writing in trailer park dialect, but hey, watcha gonna dooo.
    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
×
×
  • Create New...