Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the NFC South offenses by postion groups for 2012


panther4life

Recommended Posts

QB'S

1.New Orleans(Brees)

2.Carolina(Cam)

3.Atlanta(Ryan)

4.Tampa(Freeman)

HB'S

1.Carolina(Stewart, Williams, Tolbert)

2.New Orleans(Sproles,Pierre Thomas, and Ingram)

3.Tampa (Leblount and Doug Martin)

4.Atlanta (Turner and Jacquizz Rodgers)

W.R'S.

1.Atlanata(Roddy White, Julio Jones, Henry Douglas, Eric Weems)

2.Tampa(V-JAX,Mike Williams, Preston Parker,Benn,and Briscoe)

3.New Orleans(Colston, Devery Henderson,and Lance Moore)

4.Carolina(Smith,Lafell,Gettis,Pilares, Adams, and Armanti)

T.E

1.New Orleans(Jimmy Graham)

2Atlanta(Tony Gonzales)

3.Carolina(Greg Olsen)

4.Tampa(Dallas Clark)

*2 and 3 could flip flop this year and for our sake I hope they do

O-line(Listed form left to right)

1.Carolina(Gross, Amini, Kalil,Hangman,Otah/Bell)

2.Tampa Bay(Penn,Nicks,Zuttah,Davin Joseph,Jeremy Youngblood)

3.New Orleans(Jermon Bushrod,Grubbs,,Brian Folkerts,Jahri Evans,Jamal Brown)

4. Atlanta (Sam Baker,Blalock/Manuai/Mcclure/Peter Konz/Tyson Clabo)

Hardest postion groups to try to predict at this point are W.R., Offensive Line.

W.R. was very tough because ATL does not have much depth behind White and Jones

Tampa's looks fierce now if Mike WIlliams can play as well as he did last year and the addition of V-

Jax. Plus Parker quietly did well for them last year too.

Outside of Smith what he have is largely uknown. Lafell is looking promising and then what do we have??

O-line is tough because I don't pay a ton of attention to other teams lines but I felt safe listing Atlana's last. New Orleans center and only one I saw listed on their website may kill them, and I believe Gross is the best LT in the division and same for Kalil at Center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when you factor in Chris Ivory as well, NO might have a better stable of RBs than us, mostly because of Sproles.

I call BS!! We have the best stable in the NFL....Hands down! I've heard an argument for Houston, but come on...Tolbert added to the mix? We'll be able to eat the hell out of the clock late in games. Keep Pounding!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I call BS!! We have the best stable in the NFL....Hands down! I've heard an argument for Houston, but come on...Tolbert added to the mix? We'll be able to eat the hell out of the clock late in games. Keep Pounding!!

Not even. Homerism aside, I've got to hand it to SF. Frank Gore, Brandon Jacobs, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James?! Then I'd put NO at 2 with Sproles, Thomas, Ivory and Ingram and then us at 3 with Williams, Stewart and Tolbert.

This is just RBs mind you. If you're talking about overall rushing attack including our QB, :cam:, then I'd say we're #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even. Homerism aside, I've got to hand it to SF. Frank Gore, Brandon Jacobs, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James?! Then I'd put NO at 2 with Sproles, Thomas, Ivory and Ingram and then us at 3 with Williams, Stewart and Tolbert.

This is just RBs mind you. If you're talking about overall rushing attack including our QB, :cam:, then I'd say we're #1.

Yeah got to side with you there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even. Homerism aside, I've got to hand it to SF. Frank Gore, Brandon Jacobs, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James?! Then I'd put NO at 2 with Sproles, Thomas, Ivory and Ingram and then us at 3 with Williams, Stewart and Tolbert.

This is just RBs mind you. If you're talking about overall rushing attack including our QB, :cam:, then I'd say we're #1.

I would rather our situation or Houston over San Fran. Gore is amazing, and Hunter compliments him well, but Brandon Jacobs has been a dog baby as of late. I would take Williams/Stewart or Foster/Tate over Gore/Hunter because I don't think Hunter could be a feature back if Gore went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to put homerism to the side...but the way I look at it...D-Lo > Hunter, Tolbert > Jacobs, and I compare Gore and Stewart to one another giving the edge to Gore right now, but Stewart is younger and I don't even think we've seen the best of him yet. Gore is getting old. I think you may just be looking at fantasy stats here. I say comparing our 3 to their 3 (L. James aside)...I'd rather have our stable. Not to mention, you think we'll see all 3 of those SF backs on the field at the same time? Maybe they should, but our 3 backs on the field = dangerous!

As far as the NO argument...BS...maybe deeper? But not more talent.

Okay so maybe there is some homerism in my statement, but I can't help it damnit! I still believe we've got the strongest stable of backs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to put homerism to the side...but the way I look at it...D-Lo > Hunter, Tolbert > Jacobs, and I compare Gore and Stewart to one another giving the edge to Gore right now, but Stewart is younger and I don't even think we've seen the best of him yet. Gore is getting old. I think you may just be looking at fantasy stats here. I say comparing our 3 to their 3 (L. James aside)...I'd rather have our stable. Not to mention, you think we'll see all 3 of those SF backs on the field at the same time? Maybe they should, but our 3 backs on the field = dangerous!

As far as the NO argument...BS...maybe deeper? But not more talent.

Okay so maybe there is some homerism in my statement, but I can't help it damnit! I still believe we've got the strongest stable of backs!

See the weakest part of your argument is "LaMichael James aside". Maybe I'm biased as a PAC 12 fan, but I think that kid is going to be great. Plus he, like Sproles, is a legit Scat Back which we don't have unless we put Joe Adams in the backfield or use Smitty on the end-around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even. Homerism aside, I've got to hand it to SF. Frank Gore, Brandon Jacobs, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James?! Then I'd put NO at 2 with Sproles, Thomas, Ivory and Ingram and then us at 3 with Williams, Stewart and Tolbert.

This is just RBs mind you. If you're talking about overall rushing attack including our QB, :cam:, then I'd say we're #1.

Ingram is unproven and he has shown nothing except he's injury prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even. Homerism aside, I've got to hand it to SF. Frank Gore, Brandon Jacobs, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James?! Then I'd put NO at 2 with Sproles, Thomas, Ivory and Ingram and then us at 3 with Williams, Stewart and Tolbert.

This is just RBs mind you. If you're talking about overall rushing attack including our QB, :cam:, then I'd say we're #1.

How many NFL records does the Saints* RB stable hold?

Homerism has the opposite of the stated affect on Panther fans opinions of our backfield. People don't want the label so they underestimate, when statistically our RBs rank with the greatest hall of famers of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...