Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody Have $1.048 Billion Laying Around?


themikestrick

Recommended Posts

Wonder what influences the % of increase over the previous year? At first I thought it was strictly winning because the Giants, 49ers,Patriots, etc. have double digit increases but the Vikings lead with 22% and the Colts are 6th with 9%. Interesting.

Vikings are getting a new stadium with more high priced suites. This increases the projected future revenue stream for the team and thus the valuation of worth.

Winning really does not have that much to do with the valuation of worth. Valuation is NOTHING but a time value analysis of the projected future cashflow streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vikings are getting a new stadium with more high priced suites. This increases the projected future revenue stream for the team and thus the valuation of worth.

Winning really does not have that much to do with the valuation of worth. Valuation is NOTHING but a time value analysis of the projected future cashflow streams.

Good point on the Vikes, I thought they might be getting a stadium but couldn't remember for sure if it got passed.

It looks like winning has to influence the increase over last year in some sort no? Why else would the 49ers all of a sudden have the 2nd highest increase over last year? Their future projected cashflow streams took a big jump because they won last year and look to be building a good team for years to come or am I looking at that all wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...