Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs Conspiracy


Plewis

Recommended Posts

Alright, so I have absolutely no proof on this at all but I came up with a theory as to why the Bucs were able to destroy us so thoroughly. Yes, they tackled great all day and Josh Freeman was hot early, but it seemed to me that they knew when and where we were trying to go on a lot of plays.

It just so happens that we were training about an hour drive from Tampa all week because of the DNC in Charlotte. Does anyone else think that perhaps the Bucs could have eyes and/or ears on our practices and were able to know our gameplan and/or play calls before the game even started?

I just imagine how easy it would be for a Bucs assistant or whoever to at least put a microphone or small camera near or on our practice field for the week. I only say this because they had our number. It just seemed the playcalling for the Bucs was too perfect. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please take off your tin foil hat.

I don't believe the government can hear my thoughts but I DO believe in aliens sooooo.... you might be a little right about me. Better to be skeptical than a sheep that accepts everything blindly.

Actually, yes. You may be on to something there....good observation.

Thanks, my friends were like "No Way, you're retarded bro" at first then after the game they were like "I don't know man, you might be right."

You're not the only one with this idea...

My bad, I don't check past the front page to see if I'm reusing a topic. Thanks biscuit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew I'd get flamed for this. I'm not saying it's necessarily true, just putting it out there as a possibility. The truth is no one on this board will probably ever know if the Bucs were spying on the Panthers or not and I'm not saying they did.

I'm just saying it's a little bit suspicious that they had us totally out-gameplanned when we have a more talented coaching staff and players (in my opinion.) And it's not like cheating is unheard of in the NFL.

"If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying," isn't that what they say in NASCAR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spy gate 2012!!!!!!!! I knew it

I don't think so every snap they 2 or 3 lineman in our backfield and most of the time coming untouched that alone will blow up any option or fake that's going on. My problem is why we did not counter this pressure with quick slants and drag routes i am still baffled .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...