Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowherd just trashed Cam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

By TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam Newbie

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

Posted
Posted

And before you say he is a douche... He's right

-QB is all about what's above the shoulders

-The "read option" is a joke. All It is, is you reading about how you got dominated the day before in the game. It's a college gimmick. It doesn't work.

-Superman pose down 23-0 was a joke.

-cam is in the Vick, The Golden Calf of Bristol category. Can't win a super bowl running your QB there. It will only get you hurt.

-the way to move the ball in today's NFL is how Eli did it against us last night. Stand in the pocket and let your receivers run. Throw the ball.

God the man speaks the truth. I hate our offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

Cam is LeBron. He's held to a higher standard than other QBs, and he's not allowed to just lose. Analysts and "fans" who envy his athletic ability use his losses to nitpick his personality and mentality. Colin Cowherd is a racist anyway. The stereotypical twirp who grew up envying the jocks who now gets paid to trash them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

He's just flatly wrong. WTF does Cowherd know about plays and how they work in the NFL? He knows as much as the average Joe Blow watching on the couch each Sunday. The difference is he gets paid to spout his BS opinion. In the The Golden Calf of Bristol/Vick category? hahahahahahaha, riiiiiiiiight. That is saying Cam's biggest asset is his legs, which is not true. Cam is a mobile QB, not a run-first QB. The read option absolutely works in the NFL, but we can't run it as much as we have been. We need to get our pro-sets working, and that starts with the OL (and they fuging suck at it right now).

Basically, fug Cowherd. His opinion means poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

This is why I avoided ESPN thus far today aside from about 5 minutes of Mike and Mike. And i was able to bare that because they basically ignored how horrible we are and only spoke glowingly of how awesome the Giants are... Whew!

But, I knew guys like Cowherd and Bayless would eat this up. Cowherd was tugging all on Cam's balls last year and that's why I knew not to F with him, because just like every other subject in sports, he goes with what's popular at the time and never gives a definitive opinion on anything until he's able to decipher how the masses will react. He says what his audience wants him to say.

And this is why I'm so disappointed in our team as whole - this was our opportunity to shut the haters up. Instead, we gave them more ammo than they could ever know what to do with.

Cam will be fine, but he definitely just dug himself a hole with mainstream media and non-Panther fans (and even some idiotic Panther fans to boot) that will take a long while to get out of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...