Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We could easily go 10-6


Verge

Recommended Posts

Only if Stewart is hurt. We are consistant with him.....glaringly different without

I saw nothing today that led me to believe Stewart was the difference.

Williams saw most of the plays but they both had 11/10 carries with about the same results.

The offense did well regardless.

I may have bought into this sentiment before this game.

What did Stewart do today that made us go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw nothing today that led me to believe Stewart was the difference.

Williams saw most of the plays but they both had 11/10 carries with about the same results.

The offense did well regardless.

I may have bought into this sentiment before this game.

What did Stewart do today that made us go?

I would argue that other than Cam it was Olsen who was the offensive spark of this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're at that point in the season where people get their hopes up because we came close to beating a "good team".

Much like hanging with the SB champs Green Bay last year and Cam throwing for 400 yards.

"We're so close we just need to learn how to finish!" We all know how that season went. 1-3 and we're heading that way again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm glad every one is optimistic but man to be honest i can't see us winning over 6 depending on how the coaching staff response, if nakumura isn't bench i guarantee we won't win over 6,if play calling isn't change, if personal changes aren't made, and more. It all depends on Seattle....if we play like we did today there's hope, we could easily go 10-6 if the d line plays like that week in and out, cam plays like he did. but that consistency has yet to be established.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

Agreed... with a CBA firmly in place, a season-shortening lockout is assured not to happen. So I'm with you about 9-3 being an impossibility.

we are currently 1-3, OP stated we could go 10-6, meaning a 9-3 finish. i assume you were just being sarcastic but i felt the need to explain myself anyway because im an insecure fug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw nothing today that led me to believe Stewart was the difference.

Williams saw most of the plays but they both had 11/10 carries with about the same results.

The offense did well regardless.

I may have bought into this sentiment before this game.

What did Stewart do today that made us go?

Um, the offense actually functioned......has every game he played this year. We averaged 200+ yards on the ground this year when he plays...30 when he hasn't. Offense functions just like it did last year with him. Not just about what he does with his touches....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I ask,

What did Stewart do that made the offense go?

Like I said, playbook and offense opens up....offense functions and works. It is glaring when he isn't part of the gameplan. Defenses play a different game with Stewart.

I keep saying it......and the production keeps supporting it.

Heck, look at our first score....Newton runs better with Stewart in there. Longest run of the game was by who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...