Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these players should be cut if unwilling to restructure?

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

http://www.spotrac.c...olina-panthers/

When I list the dead money, I am referring to the remaining signing bonuses that will hit the cap. You can take the hit all in 1 year or spread it over 2 if you desginate them a june 1st cut.I don't personally condone cutting all of these guys but heres our highest paid players and their scheduled cap hits and how much it would cost to cut them(dead money)

To understand the net cap hit of cutting each indvidual take their total cap hit - minus the dead money. You can spread it over 2 years(thanks rocknrolla) but whatever number you see listed in parentheses is the amount that would take an immediate hit next to the year listed. Then the remaining numbers in parentheses would come off in the 2nd year. Scroll down and see Rocknrolla's example of spreading CJ'S cap hit over 2 years for more clarification.

Here is the scheduled cap hits by year, numbers in parenthese are guaranteed amount for that year.

Charles Johnson

13: 13 million(6 million)

14: 15 million(6 million)

15: 16 million (6 million)

16: 11 million(0 of it guaranteed)

17: free agent

18 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Beason

13:9.5 million(4 million)

14: 10.750(4 million)

15:11.750(4 million)

16:9 million (0 of if guarnteed)

17:free agent

amount of dead money to be absorbed if cut;12 million(signing bonus)

Williams

13: 8.2 million(3.2)

14: 9.2 million(3.2)

15: 10.2 million(3.2)

16:free agent

amount to of dead money to be absorbed if cut; 9.6 million(signing bonus)

Jordan Gross

13:11.7 Million(1 million)

14:9.7(0 guarnteed)

15:free agent

1 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Steve Smith

13:6.25 millon(2.5)

14:8 million(2.5)

15:11 million(2.5)

16:9 million(0 guaranteed)

17:free agent

6.5 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Chris Gamble

13:7.9 million(2)

14:8.5 million(2)

15: free agent

4 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Jonathan Stewart

13:2.8 million(1.8)

14:5.55 million(1.8)

15:8.3 million(1.8)

16:9.05 million(1.8)

17:7.75 million(0 guaranteed)

18: free agent

7.2 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Charles Godfrey

13:3.7 million(1.1)

14:7.1 million(1.1)

15:7.1 million(1.1)

16:6.4 million(0 guarnteed)

17:free agent

3.3 million to be absorbed if cut

Thomas Davis:

13:4 million(1.66)

14:7 million(1.66)

15:11.56 million(1.66)

16: free agent

4.98 million to be absorbed if cut

Greg Olsen

13:6.35(500k)

14:7.825(500k)

15:7.825(500k)

16: free agent

1.5 million to be absorbed if cut

James Anderson

13:4.4(1.4)

14:4.4(1.4)

15:5.4(1.4)

16:free agent

4.2 million to be absorbed if cut

Ron Edwards

13:3.33(833k)

14:free agent

833k to be absorbed if cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Mentor

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

oh poo, thats not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted

Why cut Ron? He is basically playing for vet minimum and we are getting solid production. Cutting him opens up another big hole at DT.

Unfortunately, I see Williams out the door for sure. I think everyone else stays. Beason, Gamble, and Gross are MUCH too valuable to let loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

    • strato
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By strato · Posted

      Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...