Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these players should be cut if unwilling to restructure?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

http://www.spotrac.c...olina-panthers/

When I list the dead money, I am referring to the remaining signing bonuses that will hit the cap. You can take the hit all in 1 year or spread it over 2 if you desginate them a june 1st cut.I don't personally condone cutting all of these guys but heres our highest paid players and their scheduled cap hits and how much it would cost to cut them(dead money)

To understand the net cap hit of cutting each indvidual take their total cap hit - minus the dead money. You can spread it over 2 years(thanks rocknrolla) but whatever number you see listed in parentheses is the amount that would take an immediate hit next to the year listed. Then the remaining numbers in parentheses would come off in the 2nd year. Scroll down and see Rocknrolla's example of spreading CJ'S cap hit over 2 years for more clarification.

Here is the scheduled cap hits by year, numbers in parenthese are guaranteed amount for that year.

Charles Johnson

13: 13 million(6 million)

14: 15 million(6 million)

15: 16 million (6 million)

16: 11 million(0 of it guaranteed)

17: free agent

18 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Beason

13:9.5 million(4 million)

14: 10.750(4 million)

15:11.750(4 million)

16:9 million (0 of if guarnteed)

17:free agent

amount of dead money to be absorbed if cut;12 million(signing bonus)

Williams

13: 8.2 million(3.2)

14: 9.2 million(3.2)

15: 10.2 million(3.2)

16:free agent

amount to of dead money to be absorbed if cut; 9.6 million(signing bonus)

Jordan Gross

13:11.7 Million(1 million)

14:9.7(0 guarnteed)

15:free agent

1 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Steve Smith

13:6.25 millon(2.5)

14:8 million(2.5)

15:11 million(2.5)

16:9 million(0 guaranteed)

17:free agent

6.5 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut.

Chris Gamble

13:7.9 million(2)

14:8.5 million(2)

15: free agent

4 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Jonathan Stewart

13:2.8 million(1.8)

14:5.55 million(1.8)

15:8.3 million(1.8)

16:9.05 million(1.8)

17:7.75 million(0 guaranteed)

18: free agent

7.2 million in dead money to be absorbed if cut

Charles Godfrey

13:3.7 million(1.1)

14:7.1 million(1.1)

15:7.1 million(1.1)

16:6.4 million(0 guarnteed)

17:free agent

3.3 million to be absorbed if cut

Thomas Davis:

13:4 million(1.66)

14:7 million(1.66)

15:11.56 million(1.66)

16: free agent

4.98 million to be absorbed if cut

Greg Olsen

13:6.35(500k)

14:7.825(500k)

15:7.825(500k)

16: free agent

1.5 million to be absorbed if cut

James Anderson

13:4.4(1.4)

14:4.4(1.4)

15:5.4(1.4)

16:free agent

4.2 million to be absorbed if cut

Ron Edwards

13:3.33(833k)

14:free agent

833k to be absorbed if cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to correct you here, when you designate a June 1st cut it doesn't cut the cap hit in half for the two years, you take the normal cap hit for the first year and then the entire remainder the following year.

For example, if Charles Johnson was designated a June 1st cut the 2013 dead money cap hit would be $6 million, and the remainder ($12 million) would hit in 2014.

oh poo, thats not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why cut Ron? He is basically playing for vet minimum and we are getting solid production. Cutting him opens up another big hole at DT.

Unfortunately, I see Williams out the door for sure. I think everyone else stays. Beason, Gamble, and Gross are MUCH too valuable to let loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why not? Dude was tough as nails. Came off the field after a vicious hit and showed the coach how his ring finger was knocked out of socket halfway up. You could see the shock on Fox's face. Brad just  pulled  on the finger, grimaced, got it back in alignment and went back in for the next play and blew up an opposing linebacker or two. Dude is legendary.
    • Motown let on like he'd like to play at least another 5 years in his presser. I fell he was truthful and us fans over did his knee. The guy started like 108 starts in a row and only missed like 2 games over each of the past years.  I think as long as the team agrees with his value that Motown has, he will sign another contract extension to push the void years into the 2030s.  OLmen can play at high levels up til 40. Trent williams is doing it, Richie Incognito leftd and came back to play until he hit 38. Lane Johnson is still playing at a top level while 38. You member Greg Van Roten, he's somehow still playing at 36 and he started here after being a substitute teacher years before. If you are able to get over the 32 year bump, its possible to reach 38 with luck. Colleges do a poor job of preparing new OLmen, many times that vet is better.   Rams were begging Andrew Whitworth to come back while he was 39, if you got the genes, luck and still willing to put in the hard work....it is possible to play until 38 as a OLmen*starting level*
    • Shaq was a fantastic LB, he just happened to have been standing in the shadow of a Panthers great and a Hall of Famer. He was team-lead starter quality for all 32 teams of the NFL. Don't throw shade on him, he was never just a guy.   
×
×
  • Create New...