Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Few updates for this Sunday


1989

Recommended Posts

I'm all for Gettis being activated, but some of you act like he'll be like Cruz. He is beyond rusty, we have no clue if his decent rookie effort was a fluke of not (hi, Keary Colbert!), and he has very little chemistry with Cam and Chud yet. Bring him back slowly so he shines late and is a factor next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for Gettis being activated, but some of you act like he'll be like Cruz. He is beyond rusty, we have no clue if his decent rookie effort was a fluke of not (hi, Keary Colbert!), and he has very little chemistry with Cam and Chud yet. Bring him back slowly so he shines late and is a factor next season.

I think people are excited because he has all the tools. Great size, hands, speed. He could really add something to our offense and people are just excited about what he could add to our offense. It would just be nice to see what he can give us because his rookie season he was one of the only positive things from that year. Nobody has said rush him back. If we brought him back any slower than we already are we'd get passed by a snail. He and others admitted he probably could have started the season active but they just decided they were fine with the receivers we had and there was no since in bringing him back. People are allowed to be excited and anxious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...