Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Another" rebuild? When did the 1st rebuild ever take place?

PantherTrain84

By PantherTrain84,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherTrain84 Newbie

PantherTrain84

Posted
Posted

After the firing of Hurney, I have heard countless times from fans things like.. "Oh great, ANOTHER rebuild." Or "Smitty will retire to avoid going through ANOTHER rebuild." Note the emphasis on the word "ANOTHER." When you really think about it, we never went into a true rebuilding phase after 2010. Adding a new QB and new coaches isnt really a "rebuild."

I mean think about it, aside from Cam and Kuechly, our roster is essentialy the same exact roster in 2010.. Jordan Gross? Check. Armanti Edwards? Check. Jimmy Clausen? Check. Steve Smith? Check. Jon Beason and Chris Gamble? Check and check. Double Trouble? Check and check.

Anyway my point is this. We never really went into a true rebuild mode after 2010, basicially we still had the same GM that resigned the same exact players.

To me rebuilding is what Jordan did with the Bobcats.. New GM, new HC, trading away all the core players and are building with brand new players from the ground up. THATS a rebuild. We have been pretty much stagnate since 2010. Sure you can say we added a new QB and new coaching staff but that doesnt equate to a "rebuild." That simply is just adding a new QB and coach, nothing more nothing less.

The TRUE Bobcats style rebuilding will begin next season with a brand new GM that will (as someone else said on here) Bain Capital this joint, now THATS what I consider rebuilding.. Again, we never even went into a rebuilding phase to begin with after 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

No one really ever go into a full rebuild mode. They always intact their core vet players. Just look at Indy for example. Wayne, Freeney, and Mathis are still all there.

For the Bobcats, I wouldnt say they're in a full rebuilding mode also. We went and signed vets in Sessions and Haywood. All we did was drafted MKG along with Kemba and Biyombo the previous year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Rebuilding is the fans excuse for the pathetic records, play and an incompetant, out of touch owner and FO.

I never believed we were a 2-14, 6-10, (and now a 1-6) team, ever. Fans will try and say that was an improvement, going from 2-14 to 6-10 but to me it wasn't because like I said, I never believed this team was that bad. Ironically, this is what everyone was saying for the 2010 seasons and now they claim we have improved, or than 6-10 isn't so bad because we are rebuilding. Doesn't make sense if you truley believed we are a better team than the record indicates.

Of course, now I am starting to rethink whether this team is as pathetic as the record indicates.

Fans will come up with excuses though and will continue to believe in such things as 'rebuilding' being the reasons for failure. As already pointed out a teams never fully 'rebuilds' every aspect.The average length of the NFL carreer should tell you there really isn't such as thing along with teams who seem to be building forever.

It's just an excuse, that's all, to some fans we are rebuilding, now, 3-4 years after the fact and will continue to be 'rebuilding' until we win games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Well the op is right in the fact we never really went into rebuild mode. There's a lot of pieces from Foxy still in place and they're the bulk of guys on the team that are meaningful players.

Of the guys who actually mean anything:

Foxy Regime:

Gamble, Beason, TD, Anderson, Charles Johnson, D'Will, Stewart, Smitty, LaFell, Kalil, Gross, Cap'n Munnerlyn, Godfrey, Martin

...I mean we are still pretty much a John Fox team with Hurney's last hoorah of picks and meanwhile these guys coaching are not really doing much with the existing talent (Rivera & Co.)

Meaningful Post-Fox Guys:

Newton, Kuechly, Norman, Alexander, Olsen, D'wan, Sila

We really do need to rebuild. It still feels like a hangover from the previous regime and not really anything new minus a shiny franchise-QB and a few very promising draft picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

Well the op is right in the fact we never really went into rebuild mode. There's a lot of pieces from Foxy still in place and they're the bulk of guys on the team that are meaningful players.

Of the guys who actually mean anything:

Foxy Regime:

Gamble, Beason, TD, Anderson, Charles Johnson, D'Will, Stewart, Smitty, LaFell, Kalil, Gross, Cap'n Munnerlyn, Godfrey, Martin

...I mean we are still pretty much a John Fox team with Hurney's last hoorah of picks and meanwhile these guys coaching are not really doing much with the existing talent (Rivera & Co.)

Meaningful Post-Fox Guys:

Newton, Kuechly, Norman, Alexander, Olsen, D'wan, Sila

We really do need to rebuild. It still feels like a hangover from the previous regime and not really anything new minus a shiny franchise-QB and a few very promising draft picks

Those 14 are only 1/4 of the roster. I would venture a guess that there are very few Foxy guys left.

Sounds to me like we pretty much did rebuild the roster.

Also, out of those 14, only 11 really need to be starters. So that is closer to only 20% of the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Those 14 are only 1/4 of the roster. I would venture a guess that there are very few Foxy guys left.

Sounds to me like we pretty much did rebuild the roster.

Also, out of those 14, only 11 really need to be starters. So that is closer to only 20% of the roster.

false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • panthers55
      Player Led culture vs Staff Led

      By panthers55 · Posted

      The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • Panthers Fan 69
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Htarnation4.0
      LOL Even the Mocks hate the Hornets

      By Htarnation4.0 · Posted

      Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...