Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

how much stock should you put into the combine?


BigSyke

Recommended Posts

there have been players that have did very well in the combine and went on to be bust. just like some players practice/preseason allstars...then dont show up in the game.

so how do you guage whether a player is just a combine allstar or is the real deal?

say hopkins or fisher has a average combine would you put that much stock into or just ignore it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combine and Pro Day says little if someone can really ball. It'll only help someone but you shouldnt go crazy about it. College game films are what really is important.

Cam had a bad Combine but a very good Pro Day. The combine didn't hurt his stock. The combine helped Kuechly's stock. If you need a certain position, you are not going to pass them up just bc of a poor or average combine showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for top tier guys it might help to differentiate how guys grade out but not drastically. If a club has two guys graded the same it might make them lean towards one vs the other but that's about it.

For late round guys it could help a bit more if they have an all world combine but I really don't see it being all that important at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certain drills can be indicative of potential in certain positions. For example, the 10-second split for linemen shows explosion off the snap, 3 cone drill for linebackers and corners shows agility in needing to react to a play, etc.

Other things like the bench, vertical, 40 yard dash, etc. are indicators of athleticism but should be given less weight as they don't translate to the field as markers of football skills really (40 can show break away speed for receivers, but even that doesn't matter if the film is lacking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me the combine is sort of a joke. You need to watch film and see what the players natural instincts are and how they play with pads on because that is something that cant be measured by any test.

The combine should be used to validate the skills you see on the field, if you watched 10 games from a particular team and never really recognized a player, but then go to the combine and he blows you away with numbers is a common mistake for many people. If it doesn't translate to the field then it doesn't matter. Workout Warrior is the term for that and every year there are multiple of these. last year it was Dontari Poe from Memphis.

For instance last year I was high on Kuechly from watching his games and thought he was a solid player. Unfortunately for him i felt he would be too slow to be a star in the NFL. After seeing his combine numbers and agility drills, his 40 time of 4.5 It solidified my opinion and I really wanted him.

I would use the combine to verify the ability of what I see on film and if those numbers translate the skills I see on the field to what is the average skills required to play in the NFL for that respective position. My main goal at the combine would be to personally meet the player and see what kind of person he really is. That's something you cant always see on the field is a players personal and family life. I want a player that is going to take it has a job and work hard every day. Best example off top of my head in this case was Koren Robinson who got drafted by the seahawks a long while back, but he came in dressed unprofessional and wore thousands of dollars of jewelry in chains and rings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
    • Seems to be the consensus from the talking heads. I really wish we had double dipped at center in the 2nd round. Sion will never play in the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...