Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chudzinski will have roster control, may call plays himself


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

From Mary Kay Cabot...

Browns' Banner on Chud's role in personnel decisions: "He won't just be involved, he'll dictate that.''

Also says it's undecided whether he'll hire an offensive coordinator or call plays himself.

Chud will decide if he or OC will call plays. Will have shared final say on 53-man roster w/ others.

And despite previous reports that he'd have a 3-4 defense, Chudzinski says he'll let whomever he hires as DC dictate what the base alignment is to be.

Chud said he'll play an attacking-style defense. As for 3-4 or 4-3, it will depend on coordinator and could go either way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Mary Kay Cabot...

Also says it's undecided whether he'll hire an offensive coordinator or call plays himself.

And despite previous reports that he'd have a 3-4 defense, Chudzinski says he'll let whomever he hires as DC dictate what the base alignment is to be.

In other words it depends if someone else is willing to pay Norv more than Cleveland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Norv chooses Cleveland over Carolina, as it sounds he has, it can only be for several reasons:

1) $

2) Maybe he's not as close with Rivera as we thought

3) And most likely in my opinion, he doesn't want to be dismissed with the rest of the staff next offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s simple. Win and everyone in here will say the culture is good. Dear lord the amount of time spent on these posts is hysterical. We’ve seen the end of season swoons where you can tell the team had given up with many of the same leaders that took us to playoff seasons. When your OL is decimated by injuries, it’s amazing how fast culture turns. When you get on a tear like 2015, everyone’s having fun. You need the right people regardless, but they have to win.
    • The difference is about how much player input is allowed and encouraged in the decision making process. Top down teams tend to dictate to players how everything is handled. Disagreements are handled by the coach and players are expected to do what they are told regardless of what they think or feel.  Players are perceived as commodities to be used until we find better. In player led teams player input is encouraged and valued. Players and especially leaders are expected to settle their own disagreements and be accountable to the team but mostly to each other. Players are family to be appreciated and supported in their growth. Is the reality of football the same in both? Yeah there are limited positions, football is a business and winning is the bottom line. Coaches get final say and run the program because that is their job. But in player led teams they feel valued, appreciated, part of a larger whole. Most people who have worked at multiple jobs know exactly what I am talking about. When players try to run the show and don't value  coach input that isn't a player led team, that is a circus which we surely are familiar with in our past.  
    • For our pics and trades tonight and tmrw.  Remember, Aho was a 2nd rounder and Slavin was a 4th rounder. 
×
×
  • Create New...