Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tebow?

tukafan21

By tukafan21,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted

I was always a fan of his coming out of college and thought he'd be a good pro, just not as a QB

Now that Jacksonville has come out and said they have no interest, he might not have anywhere he could go next year and compete as a QB

How would you guys feel if we were to sign him as not at all a QB but purely a utility player (TE, HB, FB) who gets about 15 snaps a game?

I think he could add a very interesting wrinkle to the offense and could play a little bit of each of the three positions I mentioned above. I also think he could be great for Cam in that he could learn so much from him in terms of being a leader on and off the field, he's a proven winner and I think he would be a good addition to any locker room as long as it's known he isn't a QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

The problem with The Golden Calf of Bristol if he accepted being a utility guy is (which he would be a decent one)....is it would take a couple years before the The Golden Calf of Bristol Circus disappeared.

That traveling circus may end his NFL career

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

only if we paid league minimum for his services and used him as a project conversion TE

but even then i would start to question gettleman's savvy right off the bat if it happened. we don't need the media circus that would accompany him and i would probably have to quit the huddle over the influx of idiots signing up to post about benching cam for The Golden Calf of Bristol the moment he throws an interception in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...