Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrard as backup QB?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Seriously?

You'd take Garrard before considering an extension for Anderson?

Holy balls, I'm sincerely hoping Gettelman has more sense than that.

Healthy? Garrard is simply better.

Now, Garrard is done though physically if that is your angle. Some how, some way...people got confused and think DA can play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garrard is going to be 35 next month and hasn't stepped foot on a football field since 2010. The guy would be on IR before the preseason was over.

You have to at least make an offer to Anderson, I don't give a sh!t what the Cleveland rumors are. Have you guys even looked at the list of FA QBs?

"Now, Garrard is done though physically if that is your angle."

So is Kenny Stabler, or Dan Marino or a boatload of other old, retired QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I assume you are quoting my still. If so, I don't know what your argument is since mine was simply showing a play where Bryce scored a TD against the Rams in the playoffs where another poster used a similar still of Herbert's line to defend his poor performance last night. Like I said, Herbert is a better QB but Bryce wins the game last night for the Chargers. It simply is something he does better than Herbert and would play to his strengths. Someone even said earlier Chargers only win 1 or 2 games this year if Bryce was their QB which is so absurdly laughable it wasn't even worth trying to address. I mean this thread is literally called "Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panther's History" so I understand there is no objective arguments to be had here but I found that amusing. 
    • I think his knee would make a good reason to switch to guard IF he returns.  Half don't.  Half of those don't last too long.  The strain on a knee (320lb man) vs speed rushers is more substantial.  So I would keep him if I could on a small contract (he will make $17.5 in 2026 fully guaranteed) and think of him as a possible guard for the post Lewis/Hunt era.  Knee injuries in big men are not invitations to invest in them.  
    • I'd give anything to go back to a 4-3 but we are so removed from having the pieces for that. All because Tepper wanted to force this 3-4 on all our coaches. 
×
×
  • Create New...